'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal
'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2019
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
oops
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Contribution to a collection
Publication status
Published
Published in
Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm? / Breuer, Marten (ed.). - Berlin : Springer, 2019. - (Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht ; 285). - pp. 323-350. - ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4
Abstract
The chapter analyses the national practice apparent from previous chapters, claiming that not each and every disagreement by a national actor amounts to ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the difference between res judicata and res interpretata is pivotal in this regard. In most cases, the way in which disagreement with the ECtHR is expressed is far more important than the disagreement as such (hence the claim for ‘respectful disobedience’). Finally, the chapter aims to identify the root causes of ‘principled resistance’. It argues that neither the hierarchical position of the Convention under national law nor the purported ‘national identity’ are sufficient to explain the phenomenon. Rather, ‘principled resistance’ cases should be viewed as a struggle about the proper allocation of power in the relationship between Strasbourg and the national level.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
340 Law
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
BREUER, Marten, 2019. 'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal. In: BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin:Springer, pp. 323-350. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11BibTex
@incollection{Breuer2019-07-18Princ-47197, year={2019}, doi={10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11}, title={'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal}, number={285}, isbn={978-3-662-58985-4}, publisher={Springer}, address={Berlin}, series={Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht}, booktitle={Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?}, pages={323--350}, editor={Breuer, Marten}, author={Breuer, Marten} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47197"> <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:issued>2019-07-18</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:40:41Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dcterms:title>'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The chapter analyses the national practice apparent from previous chapters, claiming that not each and every disagreement by a national actor amounts to ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the difference between res judicata and res interpretata is pivotal in this regard. In most cases, the way in which disagreement with the ECtHR is expressed is far more important than the disagreement as such (hence the claim for ‘respectful disobedience’). Finally, the chapter aims to identify the root causes of ‘principled resistance’. It argues that neither the hierarchical position of the Convention under national law nor the purported ‘national identity’ are sufficient to explain the phenomenon. Rather, ‘principled resistance’ cases should be viewed as a struggle about the proper allocation of power in the relationship between Strasbourg and the national level.</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47197"/> <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:40:41Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes