Publikation:

'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2019

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Rechtswissenschaft: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 323-350. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. 285. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11

Zusammenfassung

The chapter analyses the national practice apparent from previous chapters, claiming that not each and every disagreement by a national actor amounts to ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the difference between res judicata and res interpretata is pivotal in this regard. In most cases, the way in which disagreement with the ECtHR is expressed is far more important than the disagreement as such (hence the claim for ‘respectful disobedience’). Finally, the chapter aims to identify the root causes of ‘principled resistance’. It argues that neither the hierarchical position of the Convention under national law nor the purported ‘national identity’ are sufficient to explain the phenomenon. Rather, ‘principled resistance’ cases should be viewed as a struggle about the proper allocation of power in the relationship between Strasbourg and the national level.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BREUER, Marten, 2019. 'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal. In: BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 323-350. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. 285. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11
BibTex
@incollection{Breuer2019-07-18Princ-47197,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11},
  title={'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal},
  number={285},
  isbn={978-3-662-58985-4},
  publisher={Springer},
  address={Berlin},
  series={Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht},
  booktitle={Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?},
  pages={323--350},
  editor={Breuer, Marten},
  author={Breuer, Marten}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47197">
    <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-07-18</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:40:41Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dcterms:title>'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The chapter analyses the national practice apparent from previous chapters, claiming that not each and every disagreement by a national actor amounts to ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the difference between res judicata and res interpretata is pivotal in this regard. In most cases, the way in which disagreement with the ECtHR is expressed is far more important than the disagreement as such (hence the claim for ‘respectful disobedience’). Finally, the chapter aims to identify the root causes of ‘principled resistance’. It argues that neither the hierarchical position of the Convention under national law nor the purported ‘national identity’ are sufficient to explain the phenomenon. Rather, ‘principled resistance’ cases should be viewed as a struggle about the proper allocation of power in the relationship between Strasbourg and the national level.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47197"/>
    <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:40:41Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen