'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal

Breuer, Marten

'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2019

Publikationstyp

Beitrag zu einem Sammelband

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 323-350. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. 285. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11

Zusammenfassung

The chapter analyses the national practice apparent from previous chapters, claiming that not each and every disagreement by a national actor amounts to ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the difference between res judicata and res interpretata is pivotal in this regard. In most cases, the way in which disagreement with the ECtHR is expressed is far more important than the disagreement as such (hence the claim for ‘respectful disobedience’). Finally, the chapter aims to identify the root causes of ‘principled resistance’. It argues that neither the hierarchical position of the Convention under national law nor the purported ‘national identity’ are sufficient to explain the phenomenon. Rather, ‘principled resistance’ cases should be viewed as a struggle about the proper allocation of power in the relationship between Strasbourg and the national level.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

340 Recht

Zitieren

ISO 690

BREUER, Marten, 2019. 'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal. In: BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 323-350. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. 285. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11

BibTex

@incollection{Breuer2019-07-18Princ-47197,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11},
  title={'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal},
  number={285},
  isbn={978-3-662-58985-4},
  publisher={Springer},
  address={Berlin},
  series={Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht},
  booktitle={Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?},
  pages={323--350},
  editor={Breuer, Marten},
  author={Breuer, Marten}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47197">
    <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-07-18</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:40:41Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dcterms:title>'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The chapter analyses the national practice apparent from previous chapters, claiming that not each and every disagreement by a national actor amounts to ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the difference between res judicata and res interpretata is pivotal in this regard. In most cases, the way in which disagreement with the ECtHR is expressed is far more important than the disagreement as such (hence the claim for ‘respectful disobedience’). Finally, the chapter aims to identify the root causes of ‘principled resistance’. It argues that neither the hierarchical position of the Convention under national law nor the purported ‘national identity’ are sufficient to explain the phenomenon. Rather, ‘principled resistance’ cases should be viewed as a struggle about the proper allocation of power in the relationship between Strasbourg and the national level.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47197"/>
    <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:40:41Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja