Publikation:

Systematic review in evidence-based risk assessment

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Farhat_2-bndhw7ux5frz3.pdf
Farhat_2-bndhw7ux5frz3.pdfGröße: 2.42 MBDownloads: 87

Datum

2022

Autor:innen

Farhat, Nawal
Tsaioun, Katya
Saunders-Hastings, Patrick
Morgan, Rebecca L.
Ramoju, Siva
Krewski, Daniel

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer Spektrum. 2022, 39(3), pp. 463-479. ISSN 0946-7785. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2004111

Zusammenfassung

Systematic reviews provide a structured framework for summarizing the available evidence in a comprehensive, objective, and transparent manner. They inform evidence-based guidelines in medicine, public policy, and more recently, in environmental health and toxicology. Many regulatory agencies have extended and adapted the well-established systematic review methods, initially developed for clinical studies, for their assessment needs. The use of systematic reviews to summarize evidence from existing human, animal, and mechanistic studies can reduce reliance on animal test data in risk assessment and can help avoid unnecessary duplication of animal experiments that have already been conducted. As alternative test methods can be expected to play an increasing role in human health risk assessment in the future, systematic reviews can be particularly helpful in validating these alternatives. The field of evidence-based toxicology has undergone extensive development since its first meeting in 2007 as a result of collaborative efforts among international experts and public health agencies, particularly with respect to the use of mechanistic data and evidence integration. The continued development and wider adoption of systematic review methodology can lead to better 3R implementation. As undertaking a systematic review can be a complex and lengthy process, it is important to understand the main steps involved. Key steps, along with current best practices, are described with references to guidance from organizations with expertise in evidence synthesis. Applications of systematic reviews in clinical, observational, and experimental studies are presented. Finally, software tools available to facilitate and increase the efficiency of completing a systematic review are described.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Verknüpfte Datensätze

Zitieren

ISO 690FARHAT, Nawal, Katya TSAIOUN, Patrick SAUNDERS-HASTINGS, Rebecca L. MORGAN, Siva RAMOJU, Thomas HARTUNG, Daniel KREWSKI, 2022. Systematic review in evidence-based risk assessment. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. Springer Spektrum. 2022, 39(3), pp. 463-479. ISSN 0946-7785. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.2004111
BibTex
@article{Farhat2022Syste-58519,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.14573/altex.2004111},
  title={Systematic review in evidence-based risk assessment},
  number={3},
  volume={39},
  issn={0946-7785},
  journal={Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX},
  pages={463--479},
  author={Farhat, Nawal and Tsaioun, Katya and Saunders-Hastings, Patrick and Morgan, Rebecca L. and Ramoju, Siva and Hartung, Thomas and Krewski, Daniel}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/58519">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/58519"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Farhat, Nawal</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Ramoju, Siva</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Tsaioun, Katya</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Saunders-Hastings, Patrick</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58519/1/Farhat_2-bndhw7ux5frz3.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Krewski, Daniel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Systematic review in evidence-based risk assessment</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-09-07T10:08:51Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Farhat, Nawal</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Systematic reviews provide a structured framework for summarizing the available evidence in a comprehensive, objective, and transparent manner. They inform evidence-based guidelines in medicine, public policy, and more recently, in environmental health and toxicology. Many regulatory agencies have extended and adapted the well-established systematic review methods, initially developed for clinical studies, for their assessment needs. The use of systematic reviews to summarize evidence from existing human, animal, and mechanistic studies can reduce reliance on animal test data in risk assessment and can help avoid unnecessary duplication of animal experiments that have already been conducted. As alternative test methods can be expected to play an increasing role in human health risk assessment in the future, systematic reviews can be particularly helpful in validating these alternatives. The field of evidence-based toxicology has undergone extensive development since its first meeting in 2007 as a result of collaborative efforts among international experts and public health agencies, particularly with respect to the use of mechanistic data and evidence integration. The continued development and wider adoption of systematic review methodology can lead to better 3R implementation. As undertaking a systematic review can be a complex and lengthy process, it is important to understand the main steps involved. Key steps, along with current best practices, are described with references to guidance from organizations with expertise in evidence synthesis. Applications of systematic reviews in clinical, observational, and experimental studies are presented. Finally, software tools available to facilitate and increase the efficiency of completing a systematic review are described.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Tsaioun, Katya</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58519/1/Farhat_2-bndhw7ux5frz3.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Morgan, Rebecca L.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Saunders-Hastings, Patrick</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:contributor>Krewski, Daniel</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Morgan, Rebecca L.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Ramoju, Siva</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-09-07T10:08:51Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen