Issue substitution or volume expansion? : how parties accommodate agenda change

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2022
Autor:innen
Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz
Huber, Lena Maria
Scharrer, Manuel Elias
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Electoral Studies. Elsevier. 2022, 76, 102437. ISSN 0261-3794. eISSN 1873-6890. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102437
Zusammenfassung

How do political actors respond when an issue suddenly jumps to the top of the public agenda? While conventional theories of party behaviour predict that parties increase their attention to that issue, they tell us little about how they will do so. One approach is to increase attention to the focal issue while maintaining the messaging level on other issues (volume expansion). Alternatively, political actors can increase their attention to the focal issue while decreasing their emphasis on other issues (issue substitution). We theorize that the overall volume of communication determines which approach dominates: Parties with high communication volumes will tend towards issue substitution, whereas those with lower communication volumes will prefer volume expansion. We confirm this hypothesis using a data set covering all press releases issued by members of the Austrian parliament between 2013 and 2017—a period that includes the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ as an agenda shock.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Issue responsiveness, Agenda change, Political communication, Party competition
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690ENNSER-JEDENASTIK, Laurenz, Martin HASELMAYER, Lena Maria HUBER, Manuel Elias SCHARRER, 2022. Issue substitution or volume expansion? : how parties accommodate agenda change. In: Electoral Studies. Elsevier. 2022, 76, 102437. ISSN 0261-3794. eISSN 1873-6890. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102437
BibTex
@article{EnnserJedenastik2022-04Issue-58240,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102437},
  title={Issue substitution or volume expansion? : how parties accommodate agenda change},
  volume={76},
  issn={0261-3794},
  journal={Electoral Studies},
  author={Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz and Haselmayer, Martin and Huber, Lena Maria and Scharrer, Manuel Elias},
  note={Article Number: 102437}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/58240">
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58240/1/Ennser-Jedenastik_2-adhq10dqbqzl0.PDF"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Haselmayer, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Haselmayer, Martin</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/58240"/>
    <dcterms:title>Issue substitution or volume expansion? : how parties accommodate agenda change</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58240/1/Ennser-Jedenastik_2-adhq10dqbqzl0.PDF"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2022-04</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Scharrer, Manuel Elias</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-08-04T13:32:53Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-08-04T13:32:53Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">How do political actors respond when an issue suddenly jumps to the top of the public agenda? While conventional theories of party behaviour predict that parties increase their attention to that issue, they tell us little about how they will do so. One approach is to increase attention to the focal issue while maintaining the messaging level on other issues (volume expansion). Alternatively, political actors can increase their attention to the focal issue while decreasing their emphasis on other issues (issue substitution). We theorize that the overall volume of communication determines which approach dominates: Parties with high communication volumes will tend towards issue substitution, whereas those with lower communication volumes will prefer volume expansion. We confirm this hypothesis using a data set covering all press releases issued by members of the Austrian parliament between 2013 and 2017—a period that includes the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ as an agenda shock.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Huber, Lena Maria</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Scharrer, Manuel Elias</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Huber, Lena Maria</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen