Making Rules for Governing Global Commons

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2000
Autor:innen
Bräuninger, Thomas
König, Thomas
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2000, 44(5), pp. 604-629. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0022002700044005003
Zusammenfassung

Acentral goal of the Third United Nations Conference on the Lawof the Sea 1973-1982was to establish an international order for the use of the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction. An overwhelming majority of countries signed the comprehensive convention, but several countries including the industrialized G7 members Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the formerWest Germany rejected the new ocean regime in 1982. This article addresses the question of why some states opposed the 1982 convention by examining their preferences for alternative decision-making rules. A policy-seeking approach is used by deriving the preferences of 149 states for different decision-making rules from three components: states preferences for policies, the working properties of different decision-making rules, and the location of the status quo. Findings showwhy the 1982 proposal failed to be supported by the main industrialized countries. Some evidence exists for the successful foundation of a multicameral rule in 1994.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690BRÄUNINGER, Thomas, Thomas KÖNIG, 2000. Making Rules for Governing Global Commons. In: Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2000, 44(5), pp. 604-629. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0022002700044005003
BibTex
@article{Brauninger2000Makin-3865,
  year={2000},
  doi={10.1177/0022002700044005003},
  title={Making Rules for Governing Global Commons},
  number={5},
  volume={44},
  journal={Journal of Conflict Resolution},
  pages={604--629},
  author={Bräuninger, Thomas and König, Thomas}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3865">
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Bräuninger, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:25Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3865"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Acentral goal of the Third United Nations Conference on the Lawof the Sea 1973-1982was to establish an international order for the use of the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction. An overwhelming majority of countries signed the comprehensive convention, but several countries including the industrialized G7 members Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the formerWest Germany rejected the new ocean regime in 1982. This article addresses the question of why some states opposed the 1982 convention by examining their preferences for alternative decision-making rules. A policy-seeking approach is used by deriving the preferences of 149 states for different decision-making rules from three components: states  preferences for policies, the working properties of different decision-making rules, and the location of the status quo. Findings showwhy the 1982 proposal failed to be supported by the main industrialized countries. Some evidence exists for the successful foundation of a multicameral rule in 1994.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3865/1/Making_rules.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T10:09:25Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Making Rules for Governing Global Commons</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>König, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3865/1/Making_rules.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>König, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2000</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (2000),  5, pp. 604-629</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:creator>Bräuninger, Thomas</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen