Using forecasts of forecasters to forecast
Using forecasts of forecasters to forecast
Loading...
Date
2007
Authors
Nolte, Ingmar
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published in
International Journal of Forecasting ; 23 (2007), 1. - pp. 15-28
Abstract
Quantification techniques are popular methods in empirical research for aggregating the qualitative predictions at the microlevel into a single figure. In this paper, we analyze the forecasting performance of various methods that are based on the qualitative predictions of financial experts for major financial variables and macroeconomic aggregates. Based on the Centre of European Economic Research s Financial Markets Survey, a monthly qualitative survey of around 330 financial experts, we analyze the out-of-sample predictive quality of probability methods and regression methods. Using the modified Diebold Mariano test of Harvey, Leybourne and Newbold (Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., & Newbold, P. (1997). Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors. International Journal of Forecasting, 13, 281 291), we compare the forecasts based on survey methods with the forecasting performance of standard linear time series approaches and simple random walk forecasts.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
330 Economics
Keywords
Forecasting quality,Qualitative survey data,Quantification methods,Linear time series models,Turning points
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
NOLTE, Ingmar, Winfried POHLMEIER, 2007. Using forecasts of forecasters to forecast. In: International Journal of Forecasting. 23(1), pp. 15-28. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.05.001BibTex
@article{Nolte2007Using-12125, year={2007}, doi={10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.05.001}, title={Using forecasts of forecasters to forecast}, number={1}, volume={23}, journal={International Journal of Forecasting}, pages={15--28}, author={Nolte, Ingmar and Pohlmeier, Winfried} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/12125"> <dc:creator>Pohlmeier, Winfried</dc:creator> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:42:51Z</dc:date> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/12125"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/12125/1/Nolte_Pohlmeier_2007_Using_Forecaster_IJF.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Quantification techniques are popular methods in empirical research for aggregating the qualitative predictions at the microlevel into a single figure. In this paper, we analyze the forecasting performance of various methods that are based on the qualitative predictions of financial experts for major financial variables and macroeconomic aggregates. Based on the Centre of European Economic Research s Financial Markets Survey, a monthly qualitative survey of around 330 financial experts, we analyze the out-of-sample predictive quality of probability methods and regression methods. Using the modified Diebold Mariano test of Harvey, Leybourne and Newbold (Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., & Newbold, P. (1997). Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors. International Journal of Forecasting, 13, 281 291), we compare the forecasts based on survey methods with the forecasting performance of standard linear time series approaches and simple random walk forecasts.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Nolte, Ingmar</dc:creator> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: International Journal of Forecasting 23 (2007), 1, pp. 15-28</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:issued>2007</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Pohlmeier, Winfried</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Nolte, Ingmar</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/12125/1/Nolte_Pohlmeier_2007_Using_Forecaster_IJF.pdf"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:42:51Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Using forecasts of forecasters to forecast</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes