Publikation: General versus specific achievement goals : A re-examination
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Previous studies revealed inconsistent results regarding the relative importance of specific and general achievement goals (mastery goals, performance-approach goals, performance-avoidance goals, work-avoidance goals) in predicting specific and general scholastic outcomes (interests, importance, grades). Therefore, high-school students (N = 1210; grades 7–10) answered a questionnaire assessing these variables on a general academic and school-subject-specific (six school subjects) level. The findings showed (mostly) stronger relationships when achievement goals and scholastic outcomes matched the specificity level than when the variables were mismatched. Regarding achievement goals, mastery goals were the best predictors. The results evidenced the relevance of matching the specificity level of achievement goals and scholastic outcomes.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SPARFELDT, Jörn R., Nicole BRUNNEMANN, Linda WIRTHWEIN, Susanne R. BUCH, Johannes SCHULT, Detlef H. ROST, 2015. General versus specific achievement goals : A re-examination. In: Learning and Individual Differences. 2015, 43, pp. 170-177. ISSN 1041-6080. eISSN 1873-3425. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.022BibTex
@article{Sparfeldt2015Gener-32128, year={2015}, doi={10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.022}, title={General versus specific achievement goals : A re-examination}, volume={43}, issn={1041-6080}, journal={Learning and Individual Differences}, pages={170--177}, author={Sparfeldt, Jörn R. and Brunnemann, Nicole and Wirthwein, Linda and Buch, Susanne R. and Schult, Johannes and Rost, Detlef H.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32128"> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/> <dc:contributor>Wirthwein, Linda</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Schult, Johannes</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-11-13T07:08:56Z</dc:date> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-11-13T07:08:56Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:title>General versus specific achievement goals : A re-examination</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Buch, Susanne R.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Rost, Detlef H.</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/> <dc:creator>Sparfeldt, Jörn R.</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Previous studies revealed inconsistent results regarding the relative importance of specific and general achievement goals (mastery goals, performance-approach goals, performance-avoidance goals, work-avoidance goals) in predicting specific and general scholastic outcomes (interests, importance, grades). Therefore, high-school students (N = 1210; grades 7–10) answered a questionnaire assessing these variables on a general academic and school-subject-specific (six school subjects) level. The findings showed (mostly) stronger relationships when achievement goals and scholastic outcomes matched the specificity level than when the variables were mismatched. Regarding achievement goals, mastery goals were the best predictors. The results evidenced the relevance of matching the specificity level of achievement goals and scholastic outcomes.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Wirthwein, Linda</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/32128"/> <dc:contributor>Sparfeldt, Jörn R.</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Brunnemann, Nicole</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Rost, Detlef H.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Brunnemann, Nicole</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Schult, Johannes</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Buch, Susanne R.</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>