The Guises of and Guidance to Administrative Discretion in the European Court of Justice's Interpretation of EU Immigration Law

Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2019
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
eISSN
item.preview.dc.identifier.isbn
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
EU-Projektnummer
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Review of European Administrative Law ; 12 (2019), 1. - S. 97-126. - Paris Legal Publishers. - ISSN 1874-7981. - eISSN 1874-7973
Zusammenfassung
In EU immigration law, national authorities enjoy a degree of discretion on various accounts. However, Union law and the Court of Justice's interpretation thereof impose standards conditioning the exercise of that discretion. This contribution suggests that the acknowledgment of national administrative discretion by Union law coincides with divergent standards of guidance thereto developed by the Court of Justice. It argues that this may be the result of a deliberate choice. If Member State administrative discretion threatens to compromise the effectiveness of Union law, Luxemburg may expound stricter standards indicating how discretion must be exercised in a specific situation.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Zitieren
ISO 690BORNEMANN, Jonas, 2019. The Guises of and Guidance to Administrative Discretion in the European Court of Justice's Interpretation of EU Immigration Law. In: Review of European Administrative Law. Paris Legal Publishers. 12(1), pp. 97-126. ISSN 1874-7981. eISSN 1874-7973. Available under: doi: 10.7590/187479819X15656877527205
BibTex
@article{Bornemann2019-09-13Guise-48892,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.7590/187479819X15656877527205},
  title={The Guises of and Guidance to Administrative Discretion in the European Court of Justice's Interpretation of EU Immigration Law},
  number={1},
  volume={12},
  issn={1874-7981},
  journal={Review of European Administrative Law},
  pages={97--126},
  author={Bornemann, Jonas}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/48892">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In EU immigration law, national authorities enjoy a degree of discretion on various accounts. However, Union law and the Court of Justice's interpretation thereof impose standards conditioning the exercise of that discretion. This contribution suggests that the acknowledgment of national administrative discretion by Union law coincides with divergent standards of guidance thereto developed by the Court of Justice. It argues that this may be the result of a deliberate choice. If Member State administrative discretion threatens to compromise the effectiveness of Union law, Luxemburg may expound stricter standards indicating how discretion must be exercised in a specific situation.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/48892"/>
    <dcterms:title>The Guises of and Guidance to Administrative Discretion in the European Court of Justice's Interpretation of EU Immigration Law</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Bornemann, Jonas</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Bornemann, Jonas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-02T11:39:38Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-02T11:39:38Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-09-13</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Unbekannt