Publikation:

Simulink Design Verifier vs. SPIN : a comparative case study

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Leitner-Fischer_212922.pdf
Leitner-Fischer_212922.pdfGröße: 103.73 KBDownloads: 587

Datum

2008

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-212922
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz
Urheberrechtlich geschützt

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Informatik und Informationswissenschaft: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Sonstiges, textgebunden (z.B. Gutachten, Blogbeiträge)
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Zusammenfassung

An increasing number of industrial strength software design tools come along with veri cation tools that o er some property checking capabilities. On the other hand, there is a large number of general purpose model checking tools available. The question whether users of the industrial strength design tool preferably use the built-in state space exploration tool or a general purpose model checking tool arises quite naturally. Using the case study of an AUTOSAR compliant memory management module we compare the Simulink Design Veri er and the SPIN model checking tool in terms of their suitability to verify important correctness properties of this module. The comparison is both functional in that it analyzes the suitability to verify a set of basic system properties, and quantitative in comparing the computational efficiency of both tools.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
004 Informatik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Verknüpfte Datensätze

Zitieren

ISO 690LEITNER-FISCHER, Florian, Stefan LEUE, 2008. Simulink Design Verifier vs. SPIN : a comparative case study
BibTex
@misc{LeitnerFischer2008Simul-21292,
  year={2008},
  title={Simulink Design Verifier vs. SPIN : a comparative case study},
  author={Leitner-Fischer, Florian and Leue, Stefan},
  note={„Paper presented at FMICS 2008, ERCIM Working Group on Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems“}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/21292">
    <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/21292"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-03-12T13:22:32Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Leitner-Fischer, Florian</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">An increasing number of industrial strength software design tools come along with veri cation tools that o er some property checking capabilities. On the other hand, there is a large number of general purpose model checking tools available. The question whether users of the industrial strength design tool preferably use the built-in state space exploration tool or a general purpose model checking tool arises quite naturally. Using the case study of an AUTOSAR compliant memory management module we compare the Simulink Design Veri er and the SPIN model checking tool in terms of their suitability to verify important correctness properties of this module. The comparison is both functional in that it analyzes the suitability to verify a set of basic system properties, and quantitative in comparing the computational efficiency of both tools.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-03-12T13:22:32Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/21292/1/Leitner-Fischer_212922.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Leitner-Fischer, Florian</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/21292/1/Leitner-Fischer_212922.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Simulink Design Verifier vs. SPIN : a comparative case study</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Leue, Stefan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Leue, Stefan</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

„Paper presented at FMICS 2008, ERCIM Working Group on Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems“
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen