Publikation:

A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Beel_0-285617.pdf
Beel_0-285617.pdfGröße: 328.95 KBDownloads: 2350

Datum

2013

Autor:innen

Beel, Joeran
Genzmehr, Marcel
Langer, Stefan
Nürnberger, Andreas

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

ALEJANDRO BELLOGIN, , ed.. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reproducibility and Replication in Recommender Systems Evaluation. New York: ACM, 2013, pp. 7-14. ISBN 978-1-4503-2465-6. Available under: doi: 10.1145/2532508.2532511

Zusammenfassung

Offline evaluations are the most common evaluation method for research paper recommender systems. However, no thorough discussion on the appropriateness of offline evaluations has taken place, despite some voiced criticism. We conducted a study in which we evaluated various recommendation approaches with both offline and online evaluations. We found that results of offline and online evaluations often contradict each other. We discuss this finding in detail and conclude that offline evaluations may be inappropriate for evaluating research paper recommender systems, in many settings.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
004 Informatik

Schlagwörter

Research paper recommender systems, evaluation, offline evaluation, click-through rate, online evaluation, comparative study

Konferenz

RepSys '13, 12. Okt. 2013, Hong Kong
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BEEL, Joeran, Marcel GENZMEHR, Stefan LANGER, Andreas NÜRNBERGER, Bela GIPP, 2013. A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation. RepSys '13. Hong Kong, 12. Okt. 2013. In: ALEJANDRO BELLOGIN, , ed.. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reproducibility and Replication in Recommender Systems Evaluation. New York: ACM, 2013, pp. 7-14. ISBN 978-1-4503-2465-6. Available under: doi: 10.1145/2532508.2532511
BibTex
@inproceedings{Beel2013compa-31055,
  year={2013},
  doi={10.1145/2532508.2532511},
  title={A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation},
  isbn={978-1-4503-2465-6},
  publisher={ACM},
  address={New York},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reproducibility and Replication in Recommender Systems Evaluation},
  pages={7--14},
  editor={Alejandro Bellogin},
  author={Beel, Joeran and Genzmehr, Marcel and Langer, Stefan and Nürnberger, Andreas and Gipp, Bela}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31055">
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/31055/1/Beel_0-285617.pdf"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:creator>Beel, Joeran</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Genzmehr, Marcel</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-28T12:43:41Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Langer, Stefan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Gipp, Bela</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:creator>Genzmehr, Marcel</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/31055/1/Beel_0-285617.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-28T12:43:41Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Nürnberger, Andreas</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Offline evaluations are the most common evaluation method for research paper recommender systems. However, no thorough discussion on the appropriateness of offline evaluations has taken place, despite some voiced criticism. We conducted a study in which we evaluated various recommendation approaches with both offline and online evaluations. We found that results of offline and online evaluations often contradict each other. We discuss this finding in detail and conclude that offline evaluations may be inappropriate for evaluating research paper recommender systems, in many settings.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Langer, Stefan</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>A comparative analysis of offline and online evaluations and discussion of research paper recommender system evaluation</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31055"/>
    <dc:contributor>Gipp, Bela</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Beel, Joeran</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Nürnberger, Andreas</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen