Publikation: Conditional analyses of options for action : A partial defence
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2023
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Theoria. Wiley. 2023, 89(4), S. 548-563. ISSN 0040-5825. eISSN 1755-2567. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1111/theo.12479
Zusammenfassung
The idea of multiple options for action in a specific situation is essential for choice and deliberation. But what exactly is an option for action? A simple and natural approach to this question is via conditional analyses. While conditional analyses of dispositions and abilities face well-known objections and are widely considered untenable, I argue that several of these objections do not apply to conditional analyses of options. Others do, but the analyses can be modified or interpreted in a suitable way so as to deal with them. One central difficulty, however, remains and can only partially be resolved. Still, all things considered, the prospects of conditional analyses of options for action are quite good; they should not be lightly dismissed.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
abilities, action, compatibilism, conditional analysis, dispositions, options, possibilities
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
ROSENTHAL, Jacob, 2023. Conditional analyses of options for action : A partial defence. In: Theoria. Wiley. 2023, 89(4), S. 548-563. ISSN 0040-5825. eISSN 1755-2567. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1111/theo.12479BibTex
@article{Rosenthal2023Condi-67989,
year={2023},
doi={10.1111/theo.12479},
title={Conditional analyses of options for action : A partial defence},
number={4},
volume={89},
issn={0040-5825},
journal={Theoria},
pages={548--563},
author={Rosenthal, Jacob}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/67989">
<dcterms:title>Conditional analyses of options for action : A partial defence</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67989"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67989/1/Rosenthal_2-6dud16qtukxe1.pdf"/>
<dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-10-27T04:48:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:abstract>The idea of multiple options for action in a specific situation is essential for choice and deliberation. But what exactly is an option for action? A simple and natural approach to this question is via conditional analyses. While conditional analyses of dispositions and abilities face well-known objections and are widely considered untenable, I argue that several of these objections do not apply to conditional analyses of options. Others do, but the analyses can be modified or interpreted in a suitable way so as to deal with them. One central difficulty, however, remains and can only partially be resolved. Still, all things considered, the prospects of conditional analyses of options for action are quite good; they should not be lightly dismissed.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:creator>Rosenthal, Jacob</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-10-27T04:48:56Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67989/1/Rosenthal_2-6dud16qtukxe1.pdf"/>
<dc:contributor>Rosenthal, Jacob</dc:contributor>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
