Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag

Gipp, Bela; Meuschke, Norman; Beel, Joeran

Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag

Files

Gipp_0-285674.pdf(707.94 KB)

Date

2011

Authors

Gipp, Bela

Meuschke, Norman

Beel, Joeran

Publication type

Contribution to a conference collection

Published in

Proceedings of the 2011 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries : June 13 - 17, 2011 Ottawa, ON, Canada / Glen Newton (ed.). - New York : ACM, 2011. - pp. 255-258. - ISBN 978-1-4503-0744-4

Abstract

Various approaches for plagiarism detection exist. All are based on more or less sophisticated text analysis methods such as string matching, fingerprinting or style comparison. In this paper a new approach called Citation-based Plagiarism Detection is evaluated using a doctoral thesis, in which a volunteer crowd-sourcing project called GuttenPlag identified substantial amounts of plagiarism through careful manual inspection. This new approach is able to identify similar and plagiarized documents based on the citations used in the text. It is shown that citation-based plagiarism detection performs significantly better than text-based procedures in identifying strong paraphrasing, translation and some idea plagiarism. Detection rates can be improved by combining citation-based with text-based plagiarism detection.

Subject (DDC)

004 Computer Science

Keywords

Plagiarism Detection Systems, Citation-based Plagiarism Detection

Conference

JCDL '11, Jun 13, 2011 - Jun 17, 2011, Ottawa

Cite This

ISO 690

GIPP, Bela, Norman MEUSCHKE, Joeran BEEL, 2011. Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag. JCDL '11. Ottawa, Jun 13, 2011 - Jun 17, 2011. In: GLEN NEWTON, , ed.. Proceedings of the 2011 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries : June 13 - 17, 2011 Ottawa, ON, Canada. New York:ACM, pp. 255-258. ISBN 978-1-4503-0744-4. Available under: doi: 10.1145/1998076.1998124

BibTex

@inproceedings{Gipp2011Compa-30893,
  year={2011},
  doi={10.1145/1998076.1998124},
  title={Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag},
  isbn={978-1-4503-0744-4},
  publisher={ACM},
  address={New York},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 2011 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries : June 13 - 17, 2011 Ottawa, ON, Canada},
  pages={255--258},
  editor={Glen Newton},
  author={Gipp, Bela and Meuschke, Norman and Beel, Joeran}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30893">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Various approaches for plagiarism detection exist. All are based on more or less sophisticated text analysis methods such as string matching, fingerprinting or style comparison. In this paper a new approach called Citation-based Plagiarism Detection is evaluated using a doctoral thesis, in which a volunteer crowd-sourcing project called GuttenPlag identified substantial amounts of plagiarism through careful manual inspection. This new approach is able to identify similar and plagiarized documents based on the citations used in the text. It is shown that citation-based plagiarism detection performs significantly better than text-based procedures in identifying strong paraphrasing, translation and some idea plagiarism. Detection rates can be improved by combining citation-based with text-based plagiarism detection.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30893/1/Gipp_0-285674.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30893"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Beel, Joeran</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Gipp, Bela</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Beel, Joeran</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Meuschke, Norman</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-06T09:30:07Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Meuschke, Norman</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30893/1/Gipp_0-285674.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-06T09:30:07Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Gipp, Bela</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Bibliography of Konstanz

No