Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag
Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag
Loading...
Date
2011
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Contribution to a conference collection
Publication status
Published in
Proceedings of the 2011 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries : June 13 - 17, 2011 Ottawa, ON, Canada / Glen Newton (ed.). - New York : ACM, 2011. - pp. 255-258. - ISBN 978-1-4503-0744-4
Abstract
Various approaches for plagiarism detection exist. All are based on more or less sophisticated text analysis methods such as string matching, fingerprinting or style comparison. In this paper a new approach called Citation-based Plagiarism Detection is evaluated using a doctoral thesis, in which a volunteer crowd-sourcing project called GuttenPlag identified substantial amounts of plagiarism through careful manual inspection. This new approach is able to identify similar and plagiarized documents based on the citations used in the text. It is shown that citation-based plagiarism detection performs significantly better than text-based procedures in identifying strong paraphrasing, translation and some idea plagiarism. Detection rates can be improved by combining citation-based with text-based plagiarism detection.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
004 Computer Science
Keywords
Plagiarism Detection Systems, Citation-based Plagiarism Detection
Conference
JCDL '11, Jun 13, 2011 - Jun 17, 2011, Ottawa
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
GIPP, Bela, Norman MEUSCHKE, Joeran BEEL, 2011. Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag. JCDL '11. Ottawa, Jun 13, 2011 - Jun 17, 2011. In: GLEN NEWTON, , ed.. Proceedings of the 2011 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries : June 13 - 17, 2011 Ottawa, ON, Canada. New York:ACM, pp. 255-258. ISBN 978-1-4503-0744-4. Available under: doi: 10.1145/1998076.1998124BibTex
@inproceedings{Gipp2011Compa-30893, year={2011}, doi={10.1145/1998076.1998124}, title={Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag}, isbn={978-1-4503-0744-4}, publisher={ACM}, address={New York}, booktitle={Proceedings of the 2011 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries : June 13 - 17, 2011 Ottawa, ON, Canada}, pages={255--258}, editor={Glen Newton}, author={Gipp, Bela and Meuschke, Norman and Beel, Joeran} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30893"> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Various approaches for plagiarism detection exist. All are based on more or less sophisticated text analysis methods such as string matching, fingerprinting or style comparison. In this paper a new approach called Citation-based Plagiarism Detection is evaluated using a doctoral thesis, in which a volunteer crowd-sourcing project called GuttenPlag identified substantial amounts of plagiarism through careful manual inspection. This new approach is able to identify similar and plagiarized documents based on the citations used in the text. It is shown that citation-based plagiarism detection performs significantly better than text-based procedures in identifying strong paraphrasing, translation and some idea plagiarism. Detection rates can be improved by combining citation-based with text-based plagiarism detection.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30893/1/Gipp_0-285674.pdf"/> <dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30893"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Beel, Joeran</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Gipp, Bela</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Beel, Joeran</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Meuschke, Norman</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-06T09:30:07Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Meuschke, Norman</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/30893/1/Gipp_0-285674.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:title>Comparative Evaluation of Text- and Citation-based Plagiarism Detection Approaches using GuttenPlag</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-05-06T09:30:07Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Gipp, Bela</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
No