The Adaptive Use of Recognition in Group Decision Making
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Applying the framework of ecological rationality, the authors studied the adaptivity of group decision making. In detail, they investigated whether groups apply decision strategies conditional on their composition in terms of task-relevant features. The authors focused on the recognition heuristic, so the task-relevant features were the validity of the group members’ recognition and knowledge, which influenced the potential performance of group strategies. Forty-three three- member groups performed an inference task in which they had to infer which of two German companies had the higher market capitalization. Results based on the choice data support the hypothesis that groups adaptively apply the strategy that leads to the highest theoretically achiev- able performance. Time constraints had no effect on strategy use but did have an effect on the proportions of different types of arguments. Possible mechanisms underlying the adaptive use of recognition in group decision making are discussed.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
KÄMMER, Juliane E., Wolfgang GAISSMAIER, Torsten REIMER, Carsten C. SCHERMULY, 2014. The Adaptive Use of Recognition in Group Decision Making. In: Cognitive Science. 2014, 38(5), pp. 911-942. ISSN 0364-0213. eISSN 1551-6709. Available under: doi: 10.1111/cogs.12110BibTex
@article{Kammer2014-06Adapt-28036, year={2014}, doi={10.1111/cogs.12110}, title={The Adaptive Use of Recognition in Group Decision Making}, number={5}, volume={38}, issn={0364-0213}, journal={Cognitive Science}, pages={911--942}, author={Kämmer, Juliane E. and Gaissmaier, Wolfgang and Reimer, Torsten and Schermuly, Carsten C.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28036"> <dc:contributor>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2014-06</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-06-25T09:51:13Z</dc:date> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Schermuly, Carsten C.</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Reimer, Torsten</dc:contributor> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Cognitive Science ; 38 (2014), 5. - S. 911-942</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Schermuly, Carsten C.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Kämmer, Juliane E.</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/28036"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Gaissmaier, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Reimer, Torsten</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Kämmer, Juliane E.</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Applying the framework of ecological rationality, the authors studied the adaptivity of group decision making. In detail, they investigated whether groups apply decision strategies conditional on their composition in terms of task-relevant features. The authors focused on the recognition heuristic, so the task-relevant features were the validity of the group members’ recognition and knowledge, which influenced the potential performance of group strategies. Forty-three three- member groups performed an inference task in which they had to infer which of two German companies had the higher market capitalization. Results based on the choice data support the hypothesis that groups adaptively apply the strategy that leads to the highest theoretically achiev- able performance. Time constraints had no effect on strategy use but did have an effect on the proportions of different types of arguments. Possible mechanisms underlying the adaptive use of recognition in group decision making are discussed.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>The Adaptive Use of Recognition in Group Decision Making</dcterms:title> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28036/2/Kaemmer_280366.pdf"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/28036/2/Kaemmer_280366.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-06-25T09:51:13Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>