Data Processing : How Good Are My Data Really?
Data Processing : How Good Are My Data Really?
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2013
Authors
Karplus, P. Andrew
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
oops
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Contribution to a collection
Publication status
Published
Published in
Advancing Methods for Biomolecular Crystallography / Read, Randy J.; Urzhumtsev, Alexandre G.; Lunin, Vladimir Y. (ed.). - Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2013. - pp. 59-68. - ISBN 978-94-007-6319-7
Abstract
Since its inception more than 60 years ago, a “reliability index”, later called “R-value”, has been used to measure the agreement of model and averaged data, and a similar quantity, Rmerge, has been defined to assess the quality of the averaged data. However, a little known fact is that the two kinds of R-values have very different properties and asymptotic behaviors, and cannot be compared with each other. This is the reason that decisions concerning the high-resolution cutoff of data that are based on these R-values are questionable, and also helps explain why disagreements between journal authors and the manuscript reviewers have been so common. Here, the authors will show that a different statistic can be used to overcome these deficiencies, and will establish a direct quantitative relation between data and model quality. This relation is important to judge the extent to which the data are useful, and also gives insight into the quality of the model that is derived from the data. The theoretical and practical consequences are at variance with several commonly employed crystallographic concepts and procedures.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
570 Biosciences, Biology
Keywords
Data quality, Model quality, Resolution, R-value, Rmerge, Rwork, Rfree, Correlation coefficient
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
DIEDERICHS, Kay, P. Andrew KARPLUS, 2013. Data Processing : How Good Are My Data Really?. In: READ, Randy J., ed., Alexandre G. URZHUMTSEV, ed., Vladimir Y. LUNIN, ed.. Advancing Methods for Biomolecular Crystallography. Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands, pp. 59-68. ISBN 978-94-007-6319-7. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6232-9_6BibTex
@incollection{Diederichs2013-02-21Proce-38583, year={2013}, doi={10.1007/978-94-007-6232-9_6}, title={Data Processing : How Good Are My Data Really?}, isbn={978-94-007-6319-7}, publisher={Springer Netherlands}, address={Dordrecht}, booktitle={Advancing Methods for Biomolecular Crystallography}, pages={59--68}, editor={Read, Randy J. and Urzhumtsev, Alexandre G. and Lunin, Vladimir Y.}, author={Diederichs, Kay and Karplus, P. Andrew} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38583"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-04-24T11:24:12Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Diederichs, Kay</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Karplus, P. Andrew</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Karplus, P. Andrew</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Since its inception more than 60 years ago, a “reliability index”, later called “R-value”, has been used to measure the agreement of model and averaged data, and a similar quantity, Rmerge, has been defined to assess the quality of the averaged data. However, a little known fact is that the two kinds of R-values have very different properties and asymptotic behaviors, and cannot be compared with each other. This is the reason that decisions concerning the high-resolution cutoff of data that are based on these R-values are questionable, and also helps explain why disagreements between journal authors and the manuscript reviewers have been so common. Here, the authors will show that a different statistic can be used to overcome these deficiencies, and will establish a direct quantitative relation between data and model quality. This relation is important to judge the extent to which the data are useful, and also gives insight into the quality of the model that is derived from the data. The theoretical and practical consequences are at variance with several commonly employed crystallographic concepts and procedures.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Diederichs, Kay</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2013-02-21</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-04-24T11:24:12Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/38583"/> <dcterms:title>Data Processing : How Good Are My Data Really?</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes