A possible roadmap for systemic toxicity testing

No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2012
Editors
Contact
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
ArXiv-ID
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Restricted until
Title in another language
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Toxicology Letters ; 211 (2012), Suppl. - pp. S178-S179. - Elsevier. - ISSN 1879-3169. - eISSN 0378-4274
Abstract
Animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics is foreseen to be banned in 2013. This has enhanced the development of alternative testing methods, but despite the huge efforts, the areas of toxicokinetics, repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity, skin sensitization, and reproductive toxicity have been extensively reviewed and further scientific challenges have been identified.

In October 2011 an expert workshop, organized by the Centre of Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT-Europe) and the Trans-Atlantic Think Tank of Toxicology (t4) was held, to take a larger perspective regarding the respective areas. A forward looking strategy was discussed, taking into account latest scientific innovations, to develop a roadmap for systemic toxicity testing for cosmetics and other substances.

Each area was intensively reviewed and following recommendations were achieved: Existing testing approaches should be evaluated applying an evidence-based approach, to detect useless tests and thrive towards their abolition. Key events should be identified, which could be tackled specifically and information-rich single tests should be developed. The same approach could be used, to identify useful tests, which provide the information, leading to classification of a compound and their optimization should be boosted. The area of in silico approaches should be emerged further and integrated into a larger context. The idea of Tox21c was embraced and the identification of Pathways of Toxicity (PoT) was considered the way forward.

All these efforts should lead to Integrated testing strategies (ITS), which are scientifically sound and valid, to perform risk assessment towards an enhanced consumer safety without the use of animals.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
570 Biosciences, Biology
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690HASIWA, Nina, Mardas DANESHIAN, Marcel LEIST, Thomas HARTUNG, 2012. A possible roadmap for systemic toxicity testing. In: Toxicology Letters. Elsevier. 211(Suppl), pp. S178-S179. ISSN 1879-3169. eISSN 0378-4274. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.644
BibTex
@article{Hasiwa2012possi-52633,
  year={2012},
  doi={10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.644},
  title={A possible roadmap for systemic toxicity testing},
  number={Suppl},
  volume={211},
  issn={1879-3169},
  journal={Toxicology Letters},
  pages={S178--S179},
  author={Hasiwa, Nina and Daneshian, Mardas and Leist, Marcel and Hartung, Thomas},
  note={Meeting Abstract}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52633">
    <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-29T12:59:26Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Leist, Marcel</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Daneshian, Mardas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>A possible roadmap for systemic toxicity testing</dcterms:title>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52633"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Daneshian, Mardas</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Leist, Marcel</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-29T12:59:26Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Hasiwa, Nina</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Hasiwa, Nina</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics is foreseen to be banned in 2013. This has enhanced the development of alternative testing methods, but despite the huge efforts, the areas of toxicokinetics, repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity, skin sensitization, and reproductive toxicity have been extensively reviewed and further scientific challenges have been identified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In October 2011 an expert workshop, organized by the Centre of Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT-Europe) and the Trans-Atlantic Think Tank of Toxicology (t4) was held, to take a larger perspective regarding the respective areas. A forward looking strategy was discussed, taking into account latest scientific innovations, to develop a roadmap for systemic toxicity testing for cosmetics and other substances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Each area was intensively reviewed and following recommendations were achieved: Existing testing approaches should be evaluated applying an evidence-based approach, to detect useless tests and thrive towards their abolition. Key events should be identified, which could be tackled specifically and information-rich single tests should be developed. The same approach could be used, to identify useful tests, which provide the information, leading to classification of a compound and their optimization should be boosted. The area of in silico approaches should be emerged further and integrated into a larger context. The idea of Tox21c was embraced and the identification of Pathways of Toxicity (PoT) was considered the way forward.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All these efforts should lead to Integrated testing strategies (ITS), which are scientifically sound and valid, to perform risk assessment towards an enhanced consumer safety without the use of animals.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Contact
URL of original publication
Test date of URL
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Meeting Abstract
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed
No