Educating citizens to public reason : what can we learn from interfaith dialogue?
Educating citizens to public reason : what can we learn from interfaith dialogue?
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2022
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
eISSN
item.preview.dc.identifier.isbn
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
EU-Projektnummer
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy ; 2022. - Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. - ISSN 1369-8230. - eISSN 1743-8772
Zusammenfassung
John Rawls’s political liberalism demands that reasonable citizens comply with the duty of civility, which limits the justification of state action to public reasons. However, many religious citizens in liberal democratic societies reject the exclusion of religious reasons from public debate. What can be done to encourage these citizens to endorse public reason? Rawls proposes the idea of reasoning from conjecture (RC), i.e. directly engaging with someone’s comprehensive doctrine and showing them that such a doctrine actually supports public reason. In this article, we argue that reasoning from conjecture faces serious objections and that interfaith dialogue (ID) provides a better and more effective tool to encourage religious citizens to endorse public reason. More specifically, ID provides support to public reason by (i) relying on the principles of equality, sincerity and self-criticism, which are also central to public reason; (ii) leading participants to de-parochialize religion; and (iii) promoting tolerance. Moreover, ID avoids the main objections faced by RC, which undermine the latter’s morality and effectiveness.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Interfaith dialogue, public reason, unreasonable citizens, reasoning from conjecture
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Zitieren
ISO 690
BARDON, Aurélia, Matteo BONOTTI, Steven T. ZECH, 2022. Educating citizens to public reason : what can we learn from interfaith dialogue?. In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. ISSN 1369-8230. eISSN 1743-8772. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2073104BibTex
@article{Bardon2022-09Educa-57646, year={2022}, doi={10.1080/13698230.2022.2073104}, title={Educating citizens to public reason : what can we learn from interfaith dialogue?}, issn={1369-8230}, journal={Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy}, author={Bardon, Aurélia and Bonotti, Matteo and Zech, Steven T.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/57646"> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">John Rawls’s political liberalism demands that reasonable citizens comply with the duty of civility, which limits the justification of state action to public reasons. However, many religious citizens in liberal democratic societies reject the exclusion of religious reasons from public debate. What can be done to encourage these citizens to endorse public reason? Rawls proposes the idea of reasoning from conjecture (RC), i.e. directly engaging with someone’s comprehensive doctrine and showing them that such a doctrine actually supports public reason. In this article, we argue that reasoning from conjecture faces serious objections and that interfaith dialogue (ID) provides a better and more effective tool to encourage religious citizens to endorse public reason. More specifically, ID provides support to public reason by (i) relying on the principles of equality, sincerity and self-criticism, which are also central to public reason; (ii) leading participants to de-parochialize religion; and (iii) promoting tolerance. Moreover, ID avoids the main objections faced by RC, which undermine the latter’s morality and effectiveness.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Bardon, Aurélia</dc:creator> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-25T09:39:51Z</dc:date> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57646"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:issued>2022-09</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Bonotti, Matteo</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Bonotti, Matteo</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Zech, Steven T.</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Zech, Steven T.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Bardon, Aurélia</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Educating citizens to public reason : what can we learn from interfaith dialogue?</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-25T09:39:51Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Online First: Zeitschriftenartikel, die schon vor ihrer Zuordnung zu einem bestimmten Zeitschriftenheft (= Issue) online gestellt werden. Online First-Artikel werden auf der Homepage des Journals in der Verlagsfassung veröffentlicht.