Floral signals and filters in a wasp- and a bee-pollinated Gomphocarpus species (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadeae)

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2017
Autor:innen
Jürgens, Andreas
Ayasse, Manfred
Johnson, Steven D.
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Flora. 2017, 232, pp. 83-91. ISSN 0367-2530. eISSN 1618-0585. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2017.05.009
Zusammenfassung

Floral traits may function as attractants for some flower visitors and also as mechanisms that filter out non-beneficial flower visitors. Our current understanding of floral filter mechanisms is limited as this particular aspect of floral function has received less attention than floral attractants. Here we report on a case of two closely related Gomphocarpus species, G. physocarpus and G. fruticosus, that are similar in their general floral shape and architecture but differ in their main pollinators, which are vespid wasps and honeybees, respectively. To identify the floral traits that best explain the observed pollinators we analysed and compared the floral scent composition, the flower colour, flower morphology, and nectar sugar composition of the two species. Furthermore, the response to floral scent was tested in behavioural experiments with Belanogaster and Polistes vespid wasps. The floral scent composition differed significantly between the plant species. Acetic acid was a main component in the wasp-pollinated G. physocarpus, which is highly unusual for a floral scent bouquet. Choice experiments suggest that the species-specific odour might be responsible for the selective attraction of either wasps or bees. Furthermore, wasp-pollinated G. physocarpus flowers offer relatively large amounts of nectar that is freely accessible to insect visitors, whereas in G. fruticosus the site of nectar accumulation is covered by a specific morphological structure that makes it difficult for short-tongued insects such as wasps to access the nectar. Altogether, pollinator specialisation in the two Gomphocarpus species seem to be due to a combination of floral filter mechanisms and olfactory cues that cause flower visitors to learn to differentiate between the two species.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690BURGER, Hannah, Andreas JÜRGENS, Manfred AYASSE, Steven D. JOHNSON, 2017. Floral signals and filters in a wasp- and a bee-pollinated Gomphocarpus species (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadeae). In: Flora. 2017, 232, pp. 83-91. ISSN 0367-2530. eISSN 1618-0585. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2017.05.009
BibTex
@article{Burger2017-07Flora-40974,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1016/j.flora.2017.05.009},
  title={Floral signals and filters in a wasp- and a bee-pollinated Gomphocarpus species (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadeae)},
  volume={232},
  issn={0367-2530},
  journal={Flora},
  pages={83--91},
  author={Burger, Hannah and Jürgens, Andreas and Ayasse, Manfred and Johnson, Steven D.}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40974">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Floral traits may function as attractants for some flower visitors and also as mechanisms that filter out non-beneficial flower visitors. Our current understanding of floral filter mechanisms is limited as this particular aspect of floral function has received less attention than floral attractants. Here we report on a case of two closely related Gomphocarpus species, G. physocarpus and G. fruticosus, that are similar in their general floral shape and architecture but differ in their main pollinators, which are vespid wasps and honeybees, respectively. To identify the floral traits that best explain the observed pollinators we analysed and compared the floral scent composition, the flower colour, flower morphology, and nectar sugar composition of the two species. Furthermore, the response to floral scent was tested in behavioural experiments with Belanogaster and Polistes vespid wasps. The floral scent composition differed significantly between the plant species. Acetic acid was a main component in the wasp-pollinated G. physocarpus, which is highly unusual for a floral scent bouquet. Choice experiments suggest that the species-specific odour might be responsible for the selective attraction of either wasps or bees. Furthermore, wasp-pollinated G. physocarpus flowers offer relatively large amounts of nectar that is freely accessible to insect visitors, whereas in G. fruticosus the site of nectar accumulation is covered by a specific morphological structure that makes it difficult for short-tongued insects such as wasps to access the nectar. Altogether, pollinator specialisation in the two Gomphocarpus species seem to be due to a combination of floral filter mechanisms and olfactory cues that cause flower visitors to learn to differentiate between the two species.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Ayasse, Manfred</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Burger, Hannah</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Johnson, Steven D.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Floral signals and filters in a wasp- and a bee-pollinated Gomphocarpus species (Apocynaceae: Asclepiadeae)</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/40974"/>
    <dc:contributor>Jürgens, Andreas</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Burger, Hannah</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ayasse, Manfred</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Johnson, Steven D.</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Jürgens, Andreas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2017-07</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-12-20T07:39:35Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-12-20T07:39:35Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen