Publikation:

Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2018

Autor:innen

Cheneval, Francis

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12318
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Zukunftskolleg: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Swiss Political Science Review. Wiley. 2018, 24(3), pp. 348-358. ISSN 1424-7755. eISSN 1662-6370. Available under: doi: 10.1111/spsr.12318

Zusammenfassung

The main aim of this final essay is to draw on the insights gathered in the Debate “Do Referendums Enhance or Threaten Democracy” to inform future normative and empirical discussions about the design of popular vote processes. We first offer some clarifications regarding three of the concerns raised by respondents about our introductory essay. We then propose a systematic classification of the lines of variation along which the design of popular vote processes usually varies. More precisely, we highlight nine lines of variation: trigger, origin of the text, legal basis, scope, trigger requirements, time, ballot, information, and decision rule. We conclude by emphasizing the relevance and necessity of debating the formal institutional design of popular vote processes.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Verknüpfte Datensätze

Zitieren

ISO 690EL-WAKIL, Alice, Francis CHENEVAL, 2018. Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems. In: Swiss Political Science Review. Wiley. 2018, 24(3), pp. 348-358. ISSN 1424-7755. eISSN 1662-6370. Available under: doi: 10.1111/spsr.12318
BibTex
@article{elWakil2018Desig-55918,
  year={2018},
  doi={10.1111/spsr.12318},
  title={Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems},
  number={3},
  volume={24},
  issn={1424-7755},
  journal={Swiss Political Science Review},
  pages={348--358},
  author={el-Wakil, Alice and Cheneval, Francis}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55918">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55918"/>
    <dc:creator>Cheneval, Francis</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-12-16T15:09:41Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The main aim of this final essay is to draw on the insights gathered in the Debate “Do Referendums Enhance or Threaten Democracy” to inform future normative and empirical discussions about the design of popular vote processes. We first offer some clarifications regarding three of the concerns raised by respondents about our introductory essay. We then propose a systematic classification of the lines of variation along which the design of popular vote processes usually varies. More precisely, we highlight nine lines of variation: trigger, origin of the text, legal basis, scope, trigger requirements, time, ballot, information, and decision rule. We conclude by emphasizing the relevance and necessity of debating the formal institutional design of popular vote processes.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>el-Wakil, Alice</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>el-Wakil, Alice</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-12-16T15:09:41Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Cheneval, Francis</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen