Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems
Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2018
Authors
Cheneval, Francis
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Swiss Political Science Review ; 24 (2018), 3. - pp. 348-358. - Wiley. - ISSN 1424-7755. - eISSN 1662-6370
Abstract
The main aim of this final essay is to draw on the insights gathered in the Debate “Do Referendums Enhance or Threaten Democracy” to inform future normative and empirical discussions about the design of popular vote processes. We first offer some clarifications regarding three of the concerns raised by respondents about our introductory essay. We then propose a systematic classification of the lines of variation along which the design of popular vote processes usually varies. More precisely, we highlight nine lines of variation: trigger, origin of the text, legal basis, scope, trigger requirements, time, ballot, information, and decision rule. We conclude by emphasizing the relevance and necessity of debating the formal institutional design of popular vote processes.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
320 Politics
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
EL-WAKIL, Alice, Francis CHENEVAL, 2018. Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems. In: Swiss Political Science Review. Wiley. 24(3), pp. 348-358. ISSN 1424-7755. eISSN 1662-6370. Available under: doi: 10.1111/spsr.12318BibTex
@article{elWakil2018Desig-55918, year={2018}, doi={10.1111/spsr.12318}, title={Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems}, number={3}, volume={24}, issn={1424-7755}, journal={Swiss Political Science Review}, pages={348--358}, author={el-Wakil, Alice and Cheneval, Francis} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55918"> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55918"/> <dc:creator>Cheneval, Francis</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-12-16T15:09:41Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The main aim of this final essay is to draw on the insights gathered in the Debate “Do Referendums Enhance or Threaten Democracy” to inform future normative and empirical discussions about the design of popular vote processes. We first offer some clarifications regarding three of the concerns raised by respondents about our introductory essay. We then propose a systematic classification of the lines of variation along which the design of popular vote processes usually varies. More precisely, we highlight nine lines of variation: trigger, origin of the text, legal basis, scope, trigger requirements, time, ballot, information, and decision rule. We conclude by emphasizing the relevance and necessity of debating the formal institutional design of popular vote processes.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>el-Wakil, Alice</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>el-Wakil, Alice</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-12-16T15:09:41Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Cheneval, Francis</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
No
Refereed
Yes