Constellations of Fragility : an Empirical Typology of States

Ziaja, Sebastian; Grävingholt, Jörn; Kreibaum, Merle

Constellations of Fragility : an Empirical Typology of States

Dateien

Ziaja_2-12iscss4cri08.pdfGröße: 1.75 MBDownloads: 299

Datum

2019

Autor:innen

Ziaja, Sebastian

Grävingholt, Jörn

Kreibaum, Merle

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Gold

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Studies in Comparative International Development. 2019, 54(2), pp. 299-321. ISSN 0039-3606. eISSN 1936-6167. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s12116-019-09284-3

Zusammenfassung

We present a typology of states that distinguishes constellations of state fragility based on empirical patterns. State fragility is here defined as deficiencies in one or more of three core functions of the state. These functions include violence control, implementation capacity, and empirical legitimacy. Violence control refers to the state’s ability to manage the uses of violence within society. Implementation capacity refers to the state’s ability to provide basic public services. Empirical legitimacy refers to the population’s consent to the state’s claim to rule. Employing three to four indicators per dimension for 171 countries over the period 2005–2015 and finite mixture model clustering, we find six dominant constellations that represent different types of state dysfunctionality.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Fragile states, Typology, Measurement, State performance

Zitieren

ISO 690

ZIAJA, Sebastian, Jörn GRÄVINGHOLT, Merle KREIBAUM, 2019. Constellations of Fragility : an Empirical Typology of States. In: Studies in Comparative International Development. 2019, 54(2), pp. 299-321. ISSN 0039-3606. eISSN 1936-6167. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s12116-019-09284-3

BibTex

@article{Ziaja2019-06Const-46268,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1007/s12116-019-09284-3},
  title={Constellations of Fragility : an Empirical Typology of States},
  number={2},
  volume={54},
  issn={0039-3606},
  journal={Studies in Comparative International Development},
  pages={299--321},
  author={Ziaja, Sebastian and Grävingholt, Jörn and Kreibaum, Merle}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46268">
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Constellations of Fragility : an Empirical Typology of States</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46268"/>
    <dc:contributor>Kreibaum, Merle</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Ziaja, Sebastian</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Kreibaum, Merle</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Grävingholt, Jörn</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We present a typology of states that distinguishes constellations of state fragility based on empirical patterns. State fragility is here defined as deficiencies in one or more of three core functions of the state. These functions include violence control, implementation capacity, and empirical legitimacy. Violence control refers to the state’s ability to manage the uses of violence within society. Implementation capacity refers to the state’s ability to provide basic public services. Empirical legitimacy refers to the population’s consent to the state’s claim to rule. Employing three to four indicators per dimension for 171 countries over the period 2005–2015 and finite mixture model clustering, we find six dominant constellations that represent different types of state dysfunctionality.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Ziaja, Sebastian</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46268/1/Ziaja_2-12iscss4cri08.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-09T13:57:01Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-09T13:57:01Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-06</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Grävingholt, Jörn</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46268/1/Ziaja_2-12iscss4cri08.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Unbekannt