Rational Task Analysis : A Methodology to Benchmark Bounded Rationality

No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2016
Authors
Sims, Chris R.
Gray, Wayne D.
Editors
Contact
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
ArXiv-ID
International patent number
Link to the license
oops
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Restricted until
Title in another language
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published in
Minds and Machines ; 26 (2016), 1-2. - pp. 125-148. - ISSN 0924-6495. - eISSN 1572-8641
Abstract
How can we study bounded rationality? We answer this question by proposing rational task analysis (RTA)—a systematic approach that prevents experimental researchers from drawing premature conclusions regarding the (ir-)rationality of agents. RTA is a methodology and perspective that is anchored in the notion of bounded rationality and aids in the unbiased interpretation of results and the design of more conclusive experimental paradigms. RTA focuses on concrete tasks as the primary interface between agents and environments and requires explicating essential task elements, specifying rational norms, and bracketing the range of possible performance, before contrasting various benchmarks with actual performance. After describing RTA’s core components we illustrate its use in three case studies that examine human memory updating, multitasking behavior, and melioration. We discuss RTA’s characteristic elements and limitations by comparing it to related approaches. We conclude that RTA provides a useful tool to render the study of bounded rationality more transparent and less prone to theoretical confusion.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
Bounded rationality, Benchmarking, Optimality, Task environment, Rational analysis, Ecological rationality
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690NETH, Hansjörg, Chris R. SIMS, Wayne D. GRAY, 2016. Rational Task Analysis : A Methodology to Benchmark Bounded Rationality. In: Minds and Machines. 26(1-2), pp. 125-148. ISSN 0924-6495. eISSN 1572-8641. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11023-015-9368-8
BibTex
@article{Neth2016-03Ratio-31067,
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1007/s11023-015-9368-8},
  title={Rational Task Analysis : A Methodology to Benchmark Bounded Rationality},
  number={1-2},
  volume={26},
  issn={0924-6495},
  journal={Minds and Machines},
  pages={125--148},
  author={Neth, Hansjörg and Sims, Chris R. and Gray, Wayne D.}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31067">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Sims, Chris R.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-06-01T07:51:04Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:issued>2016-03</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-06-01T07:51:04Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Gray, Wayne D.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Rational Task Analysis : A Methodology to Benchmark Bounded Rationality</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31067"/>
    <dc:creator>Neth, Hansjörg</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">How can we study bounded rationality? We answer this question by proposing rational task analysis (RTA)—a systematic approach that prevents experimental researchers from drawing premature conclusions regarding the (ir-)rationality of agents. RTA is a methodology and perspective that is anchored in the notion of bounded rationality and aids in the unbiased interpretation of results and the design of more conclusive experimental paradigms. RTA focuses on concrete tasks as the primary interface between agents and environments and requires explicating essential task elements, specifying rational norms, and bracketing the range of possible performance, before contrasting various benchmarks with actual performance. After describing RTA’s core components we illustrate its use in three case studies that examine human memory updating, multitasking behavior, and melioration. We discuss RTA’s characteristic elements and limitations by comparing it to related approaches. We conclude that RTA provides a useful tool to render the study of bounded rationality more transparent and less prone to theoretical confusion.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Neth, Hansjörg</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Gray, Wayne D.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sims, Chris R.</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Contact
URL of original publication
Test date of URL
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed