Institutional communication revisited : preferences, opportunity structures and scientific expertise in policy networks

Thumbnail Image
Files
PREPRINT.pdf(605.12 KB)
Date
2010
Authors
Editors
Contact
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods;Bonn 2010/12
URI (citable link)
urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-144611
DOI (citable link)
ArXiv-ID
International patent number
Link to the license
In Copyright
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft
Restricted until
Title in another language
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Publication type
Preprint
Publication status
Published in
Abstract
Information exchange in policy networks is usually attributed to preference similarity, influence reputation, social trust and institutional actor roles. We suggest that political opportunity structures and transaction costs play another crucial role and estimate a rich statistical network model on tie formation in the German toxic chemicals policy domain. The results indicate that the effect of preference similarity is absorbed by other determinants while opportunity structures indeed have to be taken into account. We also find that different types of information exchange operate in complementary, but not necessarily congruent, ways.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
320 Politics
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690LEIFELD, Philip, Volker SCHNEIDER, 2010. Institutional communication revisited : preferences, opportunity structures and scientific expertise in policy networks
BibTex
@unpublished{Leifeld2010Insti-14461,
  year={2010},
  title={Institutional communication revisited : preferences, opportunity structures and scientific expertise in policy networks},
  author={Leifeld, Philip and Schneider, Volker}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/14461">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/14461"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Schneider, Volker</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Information exchange in policy networks is usually attributed to preference similarity, influence reputation, social trust and institutional actor roles. We suggest that political opportunity structures and transaction costs play another crucial role and estimate a rich statistical network model on tie formation in the German toxic chemicals policy domain. The results indicate that the effect of preference similarity is absorbed by other determinants while opportunity structures indeed have to be taken into account. We also find that different types of information exchange operate in complementary, but not necessarily congruent, ways.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/14461/1/PREPRINT.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/14461/1/PREPRINT.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-17T16:42:58Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Leifeld, Philip</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Schneider, Volker</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Leifeld, Philip</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Institutional communication revisited : preferences, opportunity structures and scientific expertise in policy networks</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-11-17T16:42:58Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Contact
URL of original publication
Test date of URL
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed