Publikation: Taking the Test Taker's Perspective : Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2020
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Assessment. Sage Publications. 2020, 27(3), pp. 572-584. ISSN 1073-1911. eISSN 1552-3489. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1073191118762049
Zusammenfassung
The multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format has been proposed as an alternative to the rating scale (RS) response format. However, it is unclear how changing the response format may affect the response process and test motivation of participants. In Study 1, we investigated the MFC response process using the think-aloud technique. In Study 2, we compared test motivation between the RS format and different versions of the MFC format (presenting 2, 3, 4, and 5 items simultaneously). The response process to MFC item blocks was similar to the RS response process but involved an additional step of weighing the items within a block against each other. The RS and MFC response format groups did not differ in their test motivation. Thus, from the test taker's perspective, the MFC format is somewhat more demanding to respond to, but this does not appear to decrease test motivation.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
SASS, Rachelle, Susanne FRICK, Ulf-Dietrich REIPS, Eunike WETZEL, 2020. Taking the Test Taker's Perspective : Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments. In: Assessment. Sage Publications. 2020, 27(3), pp. 572-584. ISSN 1073-1911. eISSN 1552-3489. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1073191118762049BibTex
@article{Sass2020-04Takin-42969,
year={2020},
doi={10.1177/1073191118762049},
title={Taking the Test Taker's Perspective : Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments},
number={3},
volume={27},
issn={1073-1911},
journal={Assessment},
pages={572--584},
author={Sass, Rachelle and Frick, Susanne and Reips, Ulf-Dietrich and Wetzel, Eunike}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42969">
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42969/1/Sass_2-lfp1k4wqs3h2.pdf"/>
<dc:creator>Sass, Rachelle</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-08-06T10:15:44Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format has been proposed as an alternative to the rating scale (RS) response format. However, it is unclear how changing the response format may affect the response process and test motivation of participants. In Study 1, we investigated the MFC response process using the think-aloud technique. In Study 2, we compared test motivation between the RS format and different versions of the MFC format (presenting 2, 3, 4, and 5 items simultaneously). The response process to MFC item blocks was similar to the RS response process but involved an additional step of weighing the items within a block against each other. The RS and MFC response format groups did not differ in their test motivation. Thus, from the test taker's perspective, the MFC format is somewhat more demanding to respond to, but this does not appear to decrease test motivation.</dcterms:abstract>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:contributor>Frick, Susanne</dc:contributor>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:contributor>Sass, Rachelle</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:title>Taking the Test Taker's Perspective : Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:creator>Reips, Ulf-Dietrich</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dcterms:issued>2020-04</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-08-06T10:15:44Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:creator>Frick, Susanne</dc:creator>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42969/1/Sass_2-lfp1k4wqs3h2.pdf"/>
<dc:contributor>Wetzel, Eunike</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42969"/>
<dc:creator>Wetzel, Eunike</dc:creator>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
