How to debunk misinformation? : An experimental online study investigating text structures and headline formats

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Kotz_2-i5r5wuo7zm25.pdf
Kotz_2-i5r5wuo7zm25.pdfGröße: 984.66 KBDownloads: 28
Datum
2023
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
British Journal of Health Psychology. Wiley. 2023, 28(4), pp. 1097-1112. ISSN 1359-107X. eISSN 2044-8287. Available under: doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12670
Zusammenfassung

Objectives Misinformation is a crucial problem, particularly online, and the success of debunking messages has so far been limited. In this study, we experimentally test how debunking text structure (truth sandwich vs. bottom-heavy) and headline format (statement vs. questions) affect the belief in misinformation across topics of the safety of COVID vaccines and GMO foods.

Design Experimental online study.

Methods A representative German sample of 4906 participants were randomly assigned to reading one of eight debunking messages in the experimentally varied formats and subsequently rated the acceptance of this message and the agreement to misinformation statements about the mentioned topics and an unrefuted control myth.

Results While the debunking messages specifically decreased the belief in the targeted myth, these beliefs and the acceptance of the debunking message were unaffected by the text structures and headline formats. Yet, they were less successful when addressing individuals with strong pre-existing, incongruent attitudes and distrust in science.

Conclusions The risk of backfire effects in debunking misinformation is low. Text structure and headline format are of relatively little importance for the effectiveness of debunking messages. Instead, writers may need to pay attention to the text being comprehensive, trustworthy and persuasive to maximize effectiveness.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
attitude, communication, Covid-19, genetically modified food, vaccination
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Datensätze
Zitieren
ISO 690KOTZ, Johannes, Helge GIESE, Laura M. KÖNIG, 2023. How to debunk misinformation? : An experimental online study investigating text structures and headline formats. In: British Journal of Health Psychology. Wiley. 2023, 28(4), pp. 1097-1112. ISSN 1359-107X. eISSN 2044-8287. Available under: doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12670
BibTex
@article{Kotz2023-06debun-67215,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.1111/bjhp.12670},
  title={How to debunk misinformation? : An experimental online study investigating text structures and headline formats},
  number={4},
  volume={28},
  issn={1359-107X},
  journal={British Journal of Health Psychology},
  pages={1097--1112},
  author={Kotz, Johannes and Giese, Helge and König, Laura M.}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/67215">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-06-23T11:50:05Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Kotz, Johannes</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67215/1/Kotz_2-i5r5wuo7zm25.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Kotz, Johannes</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>König, Laura M.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-06-23T11:50:05Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Giese, Helge</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Giese, Helge</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>Objectives
Misinformation is a crucial problem, particularly online, and the success of debunking messages has so far been limited. In this study, we experimentally test how debunking text structure (truth sandwich vs. bottom-heavy) and headline format (statement vs. questions) affect the belief in misinformation across topics of the safety of COVID vaccines and GMO foods.

Design
Experimental online study.

Methods
A representative German sample of 4906 participants were randomly assigned to reading one of eight debunking messages in the experimentally varied formats and subsequently rated the acceptance of this message and the agreement to misinformation statements about the mentioned topics and an unrefuted control myth.

Results
While the debunking messages specifically decreased the belief in the targeted myth, these beliefs and the acceptance of the debunking message were unaffected by the text structures and headline formats. Yet, they were less successful when addressing individuals with strong pre-existing, incongruent attitudes and distrust in science.

Conclusions
The risk of backfire effects in debunking misinformation is low. Text structure and headline format are of relatively little importance for the effectiveness of debunking messages. Instead, writers may need to pay attention to the text being comprehensive, trustworthy and persuasive to maximize effectiveness.</dcterms:abstract>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67215"/>
    <dcterms:title>How to debunk misinformation? : An experimental online study investigating text structures and headline formats</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2023-06</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/67215/1/Kotz_2-i5r5wuo7zm25.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>König, Laura M.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Link zu Forschungsdaten
Beschreibung der Forschungsdaten
Data, materials and the preregistered design and analysis plan
Diese Publikation teilen