Intrinsicality and counterpart theory
Intrinsicality and counterpart theory
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2016
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
oops
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Synthese ; 193 (2016), 8. - pp. 2353-2365. - ISSN 0039-7857. - eISSN 1573-0964
Abstract
It is shown that counterpart theory and the duplication account of intrinsicality—two key pieces of the Lewisian package—are incompatible. In particular, the duplication account yields the result that certain intuitively extrinsic modal properties are intrinsic. Along the way I consider a potentially more general worry concerning certain existential closures of internal relations. One conclusion is that, unless the Lewisian provides an adequate alternative to the duplication account, the reductive nature of their total theory is in jeopardy.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
100 Philosophy
Keywords
Intrinsicality, Counterpart theory, Modality, Duplicate
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
DE, Michael, 2016. Intrinsicality and counterpart theory. In: Synthese. 193(8), pp. 2353-2365. ISSN 0039-7857. eISSN 1573-0964. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0847-5BibTex
@article{De2016-08Intri-39723, year={2016}, doi={10.1007/s11229-015-0847-5}, title={Intrinsicality and counterpart theory}, number={8}, volume={193}, issn={0039-7857}, journal={Synthese}, pages={2353--2365}, author={De, Michael} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/39723"> <dc:creator>De, Michael</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-08-02T08:27:00Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/39723"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:contributor>De, Michael</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:title>Intrinsicality and counterpart theory</dcterms:title> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">It is shown that counterpart theory and the duplication account of intrinsicality—two key pieces of the Lewisian package—are incompatible. In particular, the duplication account yields the result that certain intuitively extrinsic modal properties are intrinsic. Along the way I consider a potentially more general worry concerning certain existential closures of internal relations. One conclusion is that, unless the Lewisian provides an adequate alternative to the duplication account, the reductive nature of their total theory is in jeopardy.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-08-02T08:27:00Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2016-08</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes