Datensatz:

Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution: directly comparing citizens and legislators

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Datum der Erstveröffentlichung

2023

Autor:innen

Helfer, Luzia
Giger, Nathalie

Andere Beitragende

Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung

figshare Academic Research System

Version des Datensatzes

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): 390681379
Swiss National Science Foundation: 100017_172559
Swiss National Science Foundation: 100017_178980

Projekt

Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Bewerten Sie die FAIRness der Forschungsdaten

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationsstatus
Published

Zusammenfassung

Economic inequality constitutes a defining challenge of our time and it remains puzzling why rising levels of inequality have not led to more redistribution. In this article a novel individual-level perspective is taken, with a focus on how much legislators and citizens agree on questions of redistribution and inequality, and what causes these mismatches. The study compares legislators’ views to a representative citizen sample in Switzerland. The results show considerable disagreement between the groups with legislators being more sceptical towards redistribution and seeing inequality as fairer outcome. The mismatch is only partially explained by legislators’ higher social status. Ideology plays a fundamental role as more polarisation according to ideological lines is found among elites and their attitudes are also more rooted in their ideology. In sum, the findings point to some underexplored angles of the puzzle of why not more redistribution has been observed and thus offer a valuable addition to the existing literature.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Sociology, FOS: Sociology, Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified, Science Policy, Subjective fairness of inequality, support for redistribution, congruence between political elites and citizens, social status, left-right ideology

Zugehörige Publikationen in KOPS

Publikation
Zeitschriftenartikel
Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution : directly comparing citizens and legislators
(2024) Helfer, Luzia; Giger, Nathalie; Breunig, Christian
Erschienen in: West European Politics. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 47(4), S. 893-914. ISSN 0140-2382. eISSN 1743-9655. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/01402382.2023.2170852
Link zu zugehöriger Publikation
Link zu zugehörigem Datensatz

Zitieren

ISO 690HELFER, Luzia, Nathalie GIGER, Christian BREUNIG, 2023. Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution: directly comparing citizens and legislators
BibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72134">
    <dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-03T15:00:04.000Z</dcterms:created>
    <dc:creator>Giger, Nathalie</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-30T13:12:25Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Breunig, Christian</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution: directly comparing citizens and legislators</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>Economic inequality constitutes a defining challenge of our time and it remains puzzling why rising levels of inequality have not led to more redistribution. In this article a novel individual-level perspective is taken, with a focus on how much legislators and citizens agree on questions of redistribution and inequality, and what causes these mismatches. The study compares legislators’ views to a representative citizen sample in Switzerland. The results show considerable disagreement between the groups with legislators being more sceptical towards redistribution and seeing inequality as fairer outcome. The mismatch is only partially explained by legislators’ higher social status. Ideology plays a fundamental role as more polarisation according to ideological lines is found among elites and their attitudes are also more rooted in their ideology. In sum, the findings point to some underexplored angles of the puzzle of why not more redistribution has been observed and thus offer a valuable addition to the existing literature.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/>
    <dc:creator>Helfer, Luzia</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Helfer, Luzia</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Breunig, Christian</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-30T13:12:25Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Giger, Nathalie</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72134"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
URL (Link zu den Daten)

Prüfdatum der URL

Kommentar zur Publikation

Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen