Datensatz: Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution: directly comparing citizens and legislators
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung
Autor:innen
Andere Beitragende
Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung
Version des Datensatzes
DOI (Link zu den Daten)
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Swiss National Science Foundation: 100017_172559
Swiss National Science Foundation: 100017_178980
Projekt
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationsstatus
Zusammenfassung
Economic inequality constitutes a defining challenge of our time and it remains puzzling why rising levels of inequality have not led to more redistribution. In this article a novel individual-level perspective is taken, with a focus on how much legislators and citizens agree on questions of redistribution and inequality, and what causes these mismatches. The study compares legislators’ views to a representative citizen sample in Switzerland. The results show considerable disagreement between the groups with legislators being more sceptical towards redistribution and seeing inequality as fairer outcome. The mismatch is only partially explained by legislators’ higher social status. Ideology plays a fundamental role as more polarisation according to ideological lines is found among elites and their attitudes are also more rooted in their ideology. In sum, the findings point to some underexplored angles of the puzzle of why not more redistribution has been observed and thus offer a valuable addition to the existing literature.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Zitieren
ISO 690
HELFER, Luzia, Nathalie GIGER, Christian BREUNIG, 2023. Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution: directly comparing citizens and legislatorsBibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72134"> <dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-03T15:00:04.000Z</dcterms:created> <dc:creator>Giger, Nathalie</dc:creator> <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-30T13:12:25Z</dc:date> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/> <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Breunig, Christian</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution: directly comparing citizens and legislators</dcterms:title> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/> <dcterms:abstract>Economic inequality constitutes a defining challenge of our time and it remains puzzling why rising levels of inequality have not led to more redistribution. In this article a novel individual-level perspective is taken, with a focus on how much legislators and citizens agree on questions of redistribution and inequality, and what causes these mismatches. The study compares legislators’ views to a representative citizen sample in Switzerland. The results show considerable disagreement between the groups with legislators being more sceptical towards redistribution and seeing inequality as fairer outcome. The mismatch is only partially explained by legislators’ higher social status. Ideology plays a fundamental role as more polarisation according to ideological lines is found among elites and their attitudes are also more rooted in their ideology. In sum, the findings point to some underexplored angles of the puzzle of why not more redistribution has been observed and thus offer a valuable addition to the existing literature.</dcterms:abstract> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/> <dc:creator>Helfer, Luzia</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Helfer, Luzia</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Breunig, Christian</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-30T13:12:25Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Giger, Nathalie</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72134"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>