Datensatz:

Replication Data for: Opposition to voluntary and mandated COVID-19 vaccination as a dynamic process : Evidence and policy implications of changing beliefs

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Datum der Erstveröffentlichung

2022

Autor:innen

Bowles, Samuel

Andere Beitragende

Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung

GESIS Data Archive

Version des Datensatzes

1.0.0
DOI (Link zu den Daten)
Link zur Lizenz
oops

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): EXC-2035/1 – 390681379

Projekt

Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Bewerten Sie die FAIRness der Forschungsdaten

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationsstatus
Published

Zusammenfassung

COVID-19 vaccination rates slowed in many countries during the second half of 2021, along with the emergence of vocal opposition, particularly to mandated vaccinations. Who are those resisting vaccination? Under what conditions do they change their minds? Our 3-wave representative panel survey from Germany allows us to estimate the dynamics of vaccine opposition, providing the following answers. Without mandates it may be difficult to reach and to sustain the near universal level of repeated vaccinations apparently required to contain the Delta, Omicron and likely subsequent variants. But mandates substantially increase opposition to vaccination. We find that few were opposed to voluntary vaccination in all three waves of the survey. They are just 3.3 percent of our panel, a number that we demonstrate is unlikely to be the result of response error. In contrast, the fraction consistently opposed to enforced vaccinations is 16.5 percent. Under both policies, those consistently opposed and those switching from opposition to supporting vaccination are socio-demographically virtually indistinguishable from other Germans. Thus, the mechanisms accounting for the dynamics of vaccine attitudes may apply generally across societal groups. What differentiates them from others are their beliefs about vaccination effectiveness, trust in public institutions, and whether they perceive enforced vaccination as a restriction on their freedom. We find that changing these beliefs is both possible and necessary to increase vaccine willingness, even in the case of mandates. An inference is that well-designed policies of persuasion and enforcement will be complementary, not alternatives.

This data set provides the data and Stata code used for the article. A detailed description of the variables is available from the corresponding publication. Please cite our paper if you use the data.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
330 Wirtschaft

Schlagwörter

Politikumsetzung, soziale Norm, Policy-Ansatz, intrinsische Motivation, Impfung, politische Kontrolle, Freiheit, Vertrauen, Politikberatung, Coronavirus

Zugehörige Publikationen in KOPS

Publikation
Zeitschriftenartikel
Opposition to voluntary and mandated COVID-19 vaccination as a dynamic process : Evidence and policy implications of changing beliefs
(2022) Schmelz, Katrin; Bowles, Samuel
Erschienen in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS). National Academy of Sciences. 2022, 119(13), e2118721119. ISSN 0027-8424. eISSN 1091-6490. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118721119
Link zu zugehöriger Publikation
Link zu zugehörigem Datensatz

Zitieren

ISO 690SCHMELZ, Katrin, Samuel BOWLES, 2022. Replication Data for: Opposition to voluntary and mandated COVID-19 vaccination as a dynamic process : Evidence and policy implications of changing beliefs
BibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72513">
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-02-28T13:38:39Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72513"/>
    <dc:contributor>Schmelz, Katrin</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71943"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/>
    <dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-22T11:15:09.000Z</dcterms:created>
    <dcterms:abstract>COVID-19 vaccination rates slowed in many countries during the second half of 2021, along with the emergence of vocal opposition, particularly to mandated vaccinations. Who are those resisting vaccination? Under what conditions do they change their minds? Our 3-wave representative panel survey from Germany allows us to estimate the dynamics of vaccine opposition, providing the following answers. Without mandates it may be difficult to reach and to sustain the near universal level of repeated vaccinations apparently required to contain the Delta, Omicron and likely subsequent variants. But mandates substantially increase opposition to vaccination. We find that few were opposed to voluntary vaccination in all three waves of the survey. They are just 3.3 percent of our panel, a number that we demonstrate is unlikely to be the result of response error. In contrast, the fraction consistently opposed to enforced vaccinations is 16.5 percent. Under both policies, those consistently opposed and those switching from opposition to supporting vaccination are socio-demographically virtually indistinguishable from other Germans. Thus, the mechanisms accounting for the dynamics of vaccine attitudes may apply generally across societal groups. What differentiates them from others are their beliefs about vaccination effectiveness, trust in public institutions, and whether they perceive enforced vaccination as a restriction on their freedom. We find that changing these beliefs is both possible and necessary to increase vaccine willingness, even in the case of mandates. An inference is that well-designed policies of persuasion and enforcement will be complementary, not alternatives.

This data set provides the data and Stata code used for the article. A detailed description of the variables is available from the corresponding publication. Please cite our paper if you use the data.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>Replication Data for: Opposition to voluntary and mandated COVID-19 vaccination as a dynamic process : Evidence and policy implications of changing beliefs</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71943"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2022</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/>
    <dc:creator>Bowles, Samuel</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-02-28T13:38:39Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Bowles, Samuel</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Schmelz, Katrin</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
URL (Link zu den Daten)

Prüfdatum der URL

Kommentar zur Publikation

Universitätsbibliographie
Diese Publikation teilen