Datensatz:

Replication Data for: The Politics of Status Preservation: Immigration and the Knowledge Economy Class

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Datum der Erstveröffentlichung

2025

Andere Beitragende

Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung

Harvard Dataverse

Version des Datensatzes

Version 1.0

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Bewerten Sie die FAIRness der Forschungsdaten

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationsstatus
Published

Zusammenfassung

The young, urban, and highly educated professionals that comprise the knowledge economy class are often portrayed as the champions of progressive politics in Europe. However, the coexistence of socially progressive attitudes and more conservative economic tendencies within this class deserves more scrutiny among political scientists because such tendencies, I argue, may reveal differences of consequence for electoral and policy outcomes. More specifically, I point to two analytical blindspots in research on progressive politics: the separation of socio-cultural and economic issues, which can conceal critical policy preferences within the knowledge economy class, and the prevailing dichotomy of knowledge economy ‘winners’ and ‘losers’, which can underestimate the potential for status concerns in the knowledge economy class. To illustrate why addressing both blindspots matters for advancing research on electoral outcomes and progressive policy agendas, I apply my claims to the issue of immigration. In doing so, I show how the interaction of socio-cultural progress and economic change—manifesting in this case as status gains among ethnoracial minorities—can underpin a politics of status preservation among ‘winners’ that calls for as much attention as the politics of status loss among ‘losers’ has garnered. Using cross-national survey data, I show that members of the knowledge economy class adopt a politics of status preservation in contexts where ethnoracial minorities, while not on par with advantaged white majorities, are better represented in high status positions. I conclude by considering the implications for research on progressive politics in Europe.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Social Sciences, Inequality, Immigration

Zugehörige Publikationen in KOPS

Link zu zugehöriger Publikation
Link zu zugehörigem Datensatz

Zitieren

ISO 690VAN STAALDUINEN, Briitta, 2025. Replication Data for: The Politics of Status Preservation: Immigration and the Knowledge Economy Class
BibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/73176">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/73176"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/>
    <dc:creator>Van Staalduinen, Briitta</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Van Staalduinen, Briitta</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2025</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-04-30T08:43:46Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>van Staalduinen, Briitta</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-04-30T08:43:46Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract>The young, urban, and highly educated professionals that comprise the knowledge economy class are often portrayed as the champions of progressive politics in Europe. However, the coexistence of socially progressive attitudes and more conservative economic tendencies within this class deserves more scrutiny among political scientists because such tendencies, I argue, may reveal differences of consequence for electoral and policy outcomes. More specifically, I point to two analytical blindspots in research on progressive politics: the separation of socio-cultural and economic issues, which can conceal critical policy preferences within the knowledge economy class, and the prevailing dichotomy of knowledge economy ‘winners’ and ‘losers’, which can underestimate the potential for status concerns in the knowledge economy class. To illustrate why addressing both blindspots matters for advancing research on electoral outcomes and progressive policy agendas, I apply my claims to the issue of immigration. In doing so, I show how the interaction of socio-cultural progress and economic change—manifesting in this case as status gains among ethnoracial minorities—can underpin a politics of status preservation among ‘winners’ that calls for as much attention as the politics of status loss among ‘losers’ has garnered. Using cross-national survey data, I show that members of the knowledge economy class adopt a politics of status preservation in contexts where ethnoracial minorities, while not on par with advantaged white majorities, are better represented in high status positions. I conclude by considering the implications for research on progressive politics in Europe.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-04-23T04:41:42Z</dcterms:created>
    <dcterms:title>Replication Data for: The Politics of Status Preservation: Immigration and the Knowledge Economy Class</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
URL (Link zu den Daten)

Prüfdatum der URL

Kommentar zur Publikation

Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen