Datensatz: Data from: In the presence of specialist root and shoot herbivory, invasive-range Brassica nigra populations have stronger competitive effects than native-range populations
Lade...
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung
2018
Andere Beitragende
Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung
DRYAD
Version des Datensatzes
DOI (Link zu den Daten)
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationsstatus
Published
Zusammenfassung
- The evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) hypothesis predicts that release from specialist herbivores enables invasive plants to evolve increased growth. The most powerful tests of EICA hypothesis are provided by approaches that simultaneously assess the effects of specialist herbivory and competitive interactions. However, such approaches are extremely rare, and hence how simultaneous release from root and shoot herbivory influence competitive ability of invasive plants remains little understood. 2. Here, we tested whether invasive-range Brassica nigra plants have evolved increased competitive ability, and whether expression of competitive ability depends on separate and simultaneous effects of specialist root and shoot herbivory. To do this, we grew B. nigra plants from eight invasive-range and eight native-range populations in the presence versus absence of competition with a community of native plant species, and in the absence versus presence of separate and simultaneous damage by a specialist root herbivore (Delia radicum) and a specialist shoot herbivore (Plutella xylostella). Brassica nigra performance was assessed by measuring biomass production and flowering of individual B. nigra plants. 3. In partial support of the EICA hypothesis, invasive-range B. nigra had greater flowering than native-range conspecifics in the absence of competition. However, contrary to a prediction of the EICA hypothesis, invasive-range B. nigra produced less aboveground biomass than native-range B.nigra in the absence of shoot herbivory and competition. Moreover, with simultaneous root and shoot herbivory, invasive-range B. nigra suppressed a competing community more strongly than native-range B. nigra did. 4. Synthesis: Our results suggest that invasiveness may be driven by mechanisms other than increased individual size. Simultaneous root and shoot herbivory in the invasive range may enhance suppressive effects of introduced plant species that have not completely escaped herbivore damage in the introduced range.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie
Schlagwörter
plant–herbivore interactions, Invasion ecology
Link zu zugehöriger Publikation
Zitieren
ISO 690
ODUOR, Ayub M. O., Mark VAN KLEUNEN, Marc STIFT, 2018. Data from: In the presence of specialist root and shoot herbivory, invasive-range Brassica nigra populations have stronger competitive effects than native-range populationsBibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/75236">
<dc:contributor>Oduor, Ayub M. O.</dc:contributor>
<dc:rights>Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal</dc:rights>
<dcterms:abstract>1. The evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) hypothesis predicts that release from specialist herbivores enables invasive plants to evolve increased growth. The most powerful tests of EICA hypothesis are provided by approaches that simultaneously assess the effects of specialist herbivory and competitive interactions. However, such approaches are extremely rare, and hence how simultaneous release from root and shoot herbivory influence competitive ability of invasive plants remains little understood. 2. Here, we tested whether invasive-range Brassica nigra plants have evolved increased competitive ability, and whether expression of competitive ability depends on separate and simultaneous effects of specialist root and shoot herbivory. To do this, we grew B. nigra plants from eight invasive-range and eight native-range populations in the presence versus absence of competition with a community of native plant species, and in the absence versus presence of separate and simultaneous damage by a specialist root herbivore (Delia radicum) and a specialist shoot herbivore (Plutella xylostella). Brassica nigra performance was assessed by measuring biomass production and flowering of individual B. nigra plants. 3. In partial support of the EICA hypothesis, invasive-range B. nigra had greater flowering than native-range conspecifics in the absence of competition. However, contrary to a prediction of the EICA hypothesis, invasive-range B. nigra produced less aboveground biomass than native-range B.nigra in the absence of shoot herbivory and competition. Moreover, with simultaneous root and shoot herbivory, invasive-range B. nigra suppressed a competing community more strongly than native-range B. nigra did. 4. Synthesis: Our results suggest that invasiveness may be driven by mechanisms other than increased individual size. Simultaneous root and shoot herbivory in the invasive range may enhance suppressive effects of introduced plant species that have not completely escaped herbivore damage in the introduced range.</dcterms:abstract>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:creator>Oduor, Ayub M. O.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>van Kleunen, Mark</dc:creator>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode"/>
<dcterms:title>Data from: In the presence of specialist root and shoot herbivory, invasive-range Brassica nigra populations have stronger competitive effects than native-range populations</dcterms:title>
<dc:creator>Stift, Marc</dc:creator>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-11-17T08:47:02Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:isReferencedBy>10.1111/1365-2745.12779</dcterms:isReferencedBy>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-11-17T08:47:02Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-03-21T14:12:40Z</dcterms:created>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71914"/>
<dc:contributor>van Kleunen, Mark</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71914"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75236"/>
<dc:contributor>Stift, Marc</dc:contributor>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Kommentar zur Publikation
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
