Datensatz:

Replication Data and Online Appendix for: “Individual or Collective Rights? Consequences for the Satisfaction with Democracy among Indigenous Peoples in Latin America”

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Datum der Erstveröffentlichung

2023

Andere Beitragende

Repositorium der Erstveröffentlichung

Harvard Dataverse

Version des Datensatzes

1
Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): 390681379

Projekt

Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Bewerten Sie die FAIRness der Forschungsdaten

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationsstatus
Published

Zusammenfassung

Online Appendix, Codebook and Replication Material (Data + Do-File) for the Article “Individual or Collective Rights? Consequences for the Satisfaction with Democracy among Indigenous Peoples in Latin America” When using the data, please cite this article. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2023.2213163 The dataset used for this article is based on the INDILEX database. It contains yearly information about the number of Indigenous articles adopted in each country since 1989, how many of these treat Indigenous rights as an individual or collective group rights, and a measure indicating the salience of collective over individual Indigenous rights. Article Abstract: For decades, Indigenous peoples and their movements have fought for the recognition of their rights. Since the multiculturalist turn, these demands are – at least partially – a legal reality in many countries in Latin America. Indigenous group rights can be attributed to individual group members or in a collective way to the group as such. Here, I investigate how these contrasting approaches impact on Indigenous citizens’ satisfaction with democracy. From normative theory, I derive the expectation that incorporating collective Indigenous rights increases satisfaction with democracy, because they address the historical loss of Indigenous sovereignty and open new spaces for the participation of previously marginalized groups. In contrast, the individualization of Indigenous group rights can be seen as a form of assimilation. The empirics show that collective rights increase the satisfaction with democracy among Indigenous peoples – and among the wider public. Thus, recognizing collective minority rights does not seem to stir division but sends a message that democracy is working well.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Social Sciences, Indigenous Rights, Collective Rights, Minority Rights, Latin America

Zugehörige Publikationen in KOPS

Publikation
Zeitschriftenartikel
Individual or collective rights? : Consequences for the satisfaction with democracy among Indigenous peoples in Latin America
(2023) Schmid, Sven-Patrick
Erschienen in: Democratization. Taylor & Francis. 2023, 30(6), S. 1113-1134. ISSN 1351-0347. eISSN 1743-890X. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/13510347.2023.2213163
Link zu zugehöriger Publikation
Link zu zugehörigem Datensatz

Zitieren

ISO 690SCHMID, Sven-Patrick, 2023. Replication Data and Online Appendix for: “Individual or Collective Rights? Consequences for the Satisfaction with Democracy among Indigenous Peoples in Latin America”
BibTex
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72122">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>Online Appendix, Codebook and Replication Material (Data + Do-File) for the Article “Individual or Collective Rights? Consequences for the Satisfaction with Democracy among Indigenous Peoples in Latin America” When using the data, please cite this article. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2023.2213163 The dataset used for this article is based on the INDILEX database. It contains yearly information about the number of Indigenous articles adopted in each country since 1989, how many of these treat Indigenous rights as an individual or collective group rights, and a measure indicating the salience of collective over individual Indigenous rights. Article Abstract:
For decades, Indigenous peoples and their movements have fought for the recognition of their rights. Since the multiculturalist turn, these demands are – at least partially – a legal reality in many countries in Latin America. Indigenous group rights can be attributed to individual group members or in a collective way to the group as such. Here, I investigate how these contrasting approaches impact on Indigenous citizens’ satisfaction with democracy. From normative theory, I derive the expectation that incorporating collective Indigenous rights increases satisfaction with democracy, because they address the historical loss of Indigenous sovereignty and open new spaces for the participation of previously marginalized groups. In contrast, the individualization of Indigenous group rights can be seen as a form of assimilation. The empirics show that collective rights increase the satisfaction with democracy among Indigenous peoples – and among the wider public. Thus, recognizing collective minority rights does not seem to stir division but sends a message that democracy is working well.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-30T12:22:44Z</dc:date>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:title>Replication Data and Online Appendix for: “Individual or Collective Rights? Consequences for the Satisfaction with Democracy among Indigenous Peoples in Latin America”</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71921"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72122"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/71935"/>
    <dcterms:created rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-05-17T19:06:31.000Z</dcterms:created>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Schmid, Sven-Patrick</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-01-30T12:22:44Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Schmid, Sven-Patrick</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
URL (Link zu den Daten)

Prüfdatum der URL

Kommentar zur Publikation

Universitätsbibliographie
Diese Publikation teilen