Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?

Zitieren

Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Prüfsumme: MD5:6e49058f8562e787952b4bd72f1c27b8

BROEKHUIS, Hans, Josef BAYER, 2020. Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?. In: Linguistics in the Netherlands. Benjamins. 37(1), pp. 23-37. ISSN 0929-7332. eISSN 1569-9919. Available under: doi: 10.1075/avt.00035.bro

@article{Broekhuis2020Claus-52949, title={Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?}, year={2020}, doi={10.1075/avt.00035.bro}, number={1}, volume={37}, issn={0929-7332}, journal={Linguistics in the Netherlands}, pages={23--37}, author={Broekhuis, Hans and Bayer, Josef} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/52949"> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52949"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Broekhuis, Hans</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article compares two alternatives to the standard movement-and-deletion approach to clausal ellipsis, which postulates deletion of TP after the remnants of ellipsis are (sometimes exceptionally) A′-moved into the left periphery of the clause. One alternative is the in-situ approach, which denies the involvement of movement in the derivation of clausal ellipsis; it claims that clausal ellipsis can apply to any run-of-the-mill syntactic structure and simply deletes the familiar/given information from the propositional domain of the clause. Another alternative is the selective spell-out approach; it denies the involvement of deletion and states that the remnants undergo regular A′-movement into the specifiers of specific semantically relevant functional projections (CP, FocusP, NegP, etc.), which are subsequently selected for spell-out. This article argues that the selective spell-out approach is superior to the two deletion approaches.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52949/1/Broekhuis_2-anhownznirs68.pdf"/> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Bayer, Josef</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Clausal ellipsis : Deletion or selective spell-out?</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Broekhuis, Hans</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/52949/1/Broekhuis_2-anhownznirs68.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Bayer, Josef</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-02-22T08:22:51Z</dc:date> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-02-22T08:22:51Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Dateiabrufe seit 22.02.2021 (Informationen über die Zugriffsstatistik)

Broekhuis_2-anhownznirs68.pdf 11

Das Dokument erscheint in:

KOPS Suche


Stöbern

Mein Benutzerkonto