Type of Publication: | Journal article |
Publication status: | Published |
URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-ux6jfnhxlo4n6 |
Author: | Thym, Daniel |
Year of publication: | 2020 |
Published in: | European Constitutional Law Review ; 16 (2020), 2. - pp. 187-212. - Cambridge University Press. - ISSN 1574-0196. - eISSN 1744-5515 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1574019620000127 |
Summary: |
Five decades of interaction between the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the Court of Justice – Reversal of the Solange decisions – Jurisdictional upgrade of the Charter under domestic constitutional law – Continuity of the ultra vires and constitutional identity caveats – Differences between the First and Second Senate in the approach towards EU law – Preliminary references as a new normality – Projection of the experience and doctrinal rigour of the German fundamental rights case law on the European level – ‘Primary’ application of the Grundgesetz as pragmatic guidance – Gradual evolution of overarching standards – Ordinary courts as an institutional counterbalance to the Bundesverfassungsgericht – Insistence on leeway for relative national autonomy in the interpretation and application of the Charter.
|
Subject (DDC): | 340 Law |
Link to License: | In Copyright |
Bibliography of Konstanz: | Yes |
Refereed: | Unknown |
THYM, Daniel, 2020. Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’ : The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review. In: European Constitutional Law Review. Cambridge University Press. 16(2), pp. 187-212. ISSN 1574-0196. eISSN 1744-5515. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S1574019620000127
@article{Thym2020-07-09Frien-50567, title={Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’ : The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review}, year={2020}, doi={10.1017/S1574019620000127}, number={2}, volume={16}, issn={1574-0196}, journal={European Constitutional Law Review}, pages={187--212}, author={Thym, Daniel} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/50567"> <dcterms:title>Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’ : The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Thym, Daniel</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50567"/> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-25T13:07:53Z</dc:date> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:issued>2020-07-09</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50567/1/Thym_2-ux6jfnhxlo4n6.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Thym, Daniel</dc:contributor> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-25T13:07:53Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50567/1/Thym_2-ux6jfnhxlo4n6.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Five decades of interaction between the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the Court of Justice – Reversal of the Solange decisions – Jurisdictional upgrade of the Charter under domestic constitutional law – Continuity of the ultra vires and constitutional identity caveats – Differences between the First and Second Senate in the approach towards EU law – Preliminary references as a new normality – Projection of the experience and doctrinal rigour of the German fundamental rights case law on the European level – ‘Primary’ application of the Grundgesetz as pragmatic guidance – Gradual evolution of overarching standards – Ordinary courts as an institutional counterbalance to the Bundesverfassungsgericht – Insistence on leeway for relative national autonomy in the interpretation and application of the Charter.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Thym_2-ux6jfnhxlo4n6.pdf | 5 |