Toward Good In Vitro Reporting Standards

Cite This

Files in this item

Checksum: MD5:488041642be6bb1f7dafac3d3da9cc65

HARTUNG, Thomas, Rob DE VRIES, Sebastian HOFFMANN, Helena T. HOGBERG, Lena SMIRNOVA, Katya TSAIOUN, Paul WHALEY, Marcel LEIST, 2019. Toward Good In Vitro Reporting Standards. In: Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX. 36(1), pp. 3-17. ISSN 1868-596X. eISSN 1868-8551. Available under: doi: 10.14573/altex.1812191

@article{Hartung2019Towar-44642, title={Toward Good In Vitro Reporting Standards}, year={2019}, doi={10.14573/altex.1812191}, number={1}, volume={36}, issn={1868-596X}, journal={Alternatives to Animal Experimentation : ALTEX}, pages={3--17}, author={Hartung, Thomas and De Vries, Rob and Hoffmann, Sebastian and Hogberg, Helena T. and Smirnova, Lena and Tsaioun, Katya and Whaley, Paul and Leist, Marcel} }

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/44642"> <dc:contributor>De Vries, Rob</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Tsaioun, Katya</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Tsaioun, Katya</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Smirnova, Lena</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Hoffmann, Sebastian</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>De Vries, Rob</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Hogberg, Helena T.</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dcterms:title>Toward Good In Vitro Reporting Standards</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Hoffmann, Sebastian</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-01-21T12:23:39Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dc:contributor>Smirnova, Lena</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-01-21T12:23:39Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Whaley, Paul</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Whaley, Paul</dc:creator> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44642/1/Hartung_2-dtknemkfo4ux2.pdf"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dc:contributor>Hogberg, Helena T.</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44642/1/Hartung_2-dtknemkfo4ux2.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44642"/> <dc:contributor>Leist, Marcel</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Leist, Marcel</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">A good experiment reported badly is worthless. Meaningful contributions to the body of science are made by sharing the full methodology and results so that they can be evaluated and reproduced by peers. Erroneous and incomplete reporting does not do justice to the resources spent on conducting the experiment and the time peers spend reading the article. In theory peer-review should ensure adequate reporting - in practice it does not. Many areas have developed reporting standards and checklists to support the adequate reporting of scientific efforts, but in vitro research still has no generally accepted criteria. It is characterized by a "Wild West" or "anything goes" attitude. Such a culture may undermine trust in the reproducibility of animal-free methods, and thus parallel the "reproducibility crisis" discussed for other life science fields. The increasing data retrieval needs of computational approaches (in extreme as "big data" and artificial intelligence) makes reporting quality even more important so that the scientific community can take full advantage of the results. The first priority of reporting standards is to ensure the completeness and transparency of information provided (data focus). The second tier is a quality of data display that makes information digestible and easy to grasp, compare and further analyze (information focus). This article summarizes a series of initiatives geared towards improving the quality of in vitro work and its reporting. This shall ultimately lead to Good In Vitro Reporting Standards (GIVReSt).</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>

Downloads since Jan 21, 2019 (Information about access statistics)

Hartung_2-dtknemkfo4ux2.pdf 176

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search KOPS


Browse

My Account