Type of Publication: | Journal article |
URI (citable link): | http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-203179 |
Author: | Wright, Anthony A.; Delius, Juan |
Year of publication: | 2005 |
Published in: | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes ; 31 (2005), 4. - pp. 425-432. - ISSN 1939-2184 |
Pubmed ID: | 16248729 |
DOI (citable link): | https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.425 |
Summary: |
Eight pigeons learned either matching (to sample) or oddity (from sample) with or without reward for sample responding. The training stimuli were coarse-white, fine-black, or smooth-mauve gravels in pots with buried grain as the reinforcer. Oddity without sample reward was learned most rapidly, followed by matching with sample reward, oddity with sample reward, and matching without sample reward. Transfer was related to acquisition rate: The oddity group without sample reward showed full (equal to baseline) color and texture transfer; the matching group with sample reward showed partial texture transfer; other groups showed no transfer. Sample reward was shown to determine rate of acquisition of matching and oddity and the oddity preference effect. The results are discussed in terms of item-specific associations operating early in learning prior to any relational learning between sample and comparison stimuli.
|
Subject (DDC): | 150 Psychology |
Link to License: | In Copyright |
WRIGHT, Anthony A., Juan DELIUS, 2005. Learning processes in matching and oddity : the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. 31(4), pp. 425-432. ISSN 1939-2184. Available under: doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.425
@article{Wright2005-10Learn-20317, title={Learning processes in matching and oddity : the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement}, year={2005}, doi={10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.425}, number={4}, volume={31}, issn={1939-2184}, journal={Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes}, pages={425--432}, author={Wright, Anthony A. and Delius, Juan} }
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/20317"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/jspui"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Journal of Experimental Psychology : Animal Behavior Processes ; 31 (2005), 4. - S. 425-432</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/20317/1/Delius%20Learning%20processes.pdf"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/20317/1/Delius%20Learning%20processes.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/20317"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-09-28T07:34:46Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Delius, Juan</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Delius, Juan</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2005-10</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:title>Learning processes in matching and oddity : the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Wright, Anthony A.</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Eight pigeons learned either matching (to sample) or oddity (from sample) with or without reward for sample responding. The training stimuli were coarse-white, fine-black, or smooth-mauve gravels in pots with buried grain as the reinforcer. Oddity without sample reward was learned most rapidly, followed by matching with sample reward, oddity with sample reward, and matching without sample reward. Transfer was related to acquisition rate: The oddity group without sample reward showed full (equal to baseline) color and texture transfer; the matching group with sample reward showed partial texture transfer; other groups showed no transfer. Sample reward was shown to determine rate of acquisition of matching and oddity and the oddity preference effect. The results are discussed in terms of item-specific associations operating early in learning prior to any relational learning between sample and comparison stimuli.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Wright, Anthony A.</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-09-28T07:34:46Z</dc:date> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Delius Learning processes.pdf | 575 |